To: AC Flyer who wrote (40430 ) 10/29/2003 9:20:41 PM From: Seeker of Truth Respond to of 74559 <Prediction without a time table is useless> Hello Deferred Bear, It seems to me that in the stock market we are always predicting without a time table. Say you buy attractive stock X. Naturally you are expecting it to go up. It may double in a month or in five years, we don't really know. Barring wild inflation, both are good outcomes. Can you really say for certain at the moment of buying that you are buying near a local bottom? If you happen to sell it some years later because you need the money for something even more attractive, do you really know that it will henceforth do less well than the apparently more attractive stock? Your point about the opportunity cost sounds very reasonable but suppose we think stocks are generally overvalued and can't find an exception? Waiting with cash is an opportunity cost if we had realized that stock X was not overpriced or would not be so considered by the market. But that's the commonest thing in investing, i.e. getting the value thing wrong. Or, you see some interesting stock but you'd like to buy it cheaper, as you think it's a bit overvalued just now. Do we really know for sure ever? To get down to the present situation, I think the heaviest blow of "the end of the world" will hit the US not because US people are more wicked or something like that, but because the US $ has been regarded as a standard of value for so long that the US federal government and US consumers have managed to live on the never never. Other countries have had to pay their bills. For example in the most recent fiscal year Canada had a small surplus of seven billion dollars Canadian. But the US had a deficit of around 500 billion. Canada is forced to balance its budgets because of its chronically poor record in the past. Cold calculators around the world want to see the Canadian debt decrease before they buy more Canadian bonds when the present ones come due. The US will be forced to do similar things, sooner or later. Meanwhile we will do best investing outside of the US, and preferably in companies which don't depend on the US consumer. That's not an opportunity cost. If we invest in the US we have an opportunity cost of not investing in Canada etc. I'm probably more bullish on the planet earth minus the US than Jay who thinks the tremors will shake all countries's stock markets. I remember October or was it November 1987. At the time the Japanese stock market went down considerably less than the US market and recovered more rapidly, so the US non-US coupling may not be so tight. Taking an umbrella lacks a timetable for rain but it costs very little. I remember Buffett's remarks about the tech stocks and I figured that, not working with technology, he didn't realize the amazing potential and he still remained a genius in handling the non-tech stocks. I scoffed but he was perfectly right. Now as to his present ideas ...? By the way when Jay predicted the tech crash he didn't give a timetable but in fact the tech market didn't go up after his prediction. Did I pay attention to him? No, only till I'd lost a big bundle. This time around I've been buying gold and consider it an opportunity gain, not an opportunity cost. Sorry for all the wordiness, too busy to condense it. Lots of luck pursuing your opportunities.