SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tech Master who wrote (483431)10/29/2003 5:13:19 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
"I agree that it will be a long, hard road. Nobody has ever said anything different."

>>> Actually, many of the 'neo-cons' ("new Cons"... 'ya gotta love that truth in advertising) did: there was a lot of loose talk before the war about how the Iraqi oil revenue would pay for everything,.

"Wars suck..."

>>> No doubt.

"but the alternative is worse."

>>> You mean peace?

>>> IMO, it all comes down to risk/reward... and Opportunity Cost - the cost of forgone opportunities.

>>> Figure... what? 1/2 Trillion dollars, or $600 Billion or so cost to the American taxpayers before we can extricate ourselves? (Not counting, of course, all the INTEREST COSTS that will add up on that debt - since the war was paid for with borrowed money - over the next 30 years or so... maybe cracking the $1 Trillion mark in the end.)

>>> What ELSE could 1/2 to 1 Trillion dollars have bought us? Total US energy independence? A paid-up healthcare system? A balanced budget? A reformed, next generation defense force? A funded privatization of the Social Security system?

>>> Some things are just better VALUES.

>>> That old dictator Saddam was in his seventies... and apparently mostly WMD-less in a dangerous neighborhood. By all rights, we should have gotten rid of him during Desert Storm - but Bush I either didn't have the guts... or strategic vision... or, if we take him at his word, he feared the CONSEQUENCES.

>>> But that was then, this is now... what is our best allocation of resources?