Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (484311)	10/31/2003 5:33:36 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

PT, I'll let Dan answer the questions you pose. He's coy, but he knows more than he lets on. <gg> In the meantime, here's something that Dan knows a thing or two about. The art of the lie. Also known in some parts as "public relations". This is certainly getting to be a dirty word in America today. Why, I even get a weekly update on all the latest outrages from the PR specialists who make the Bush team appear a whole lot less malevolent than they truly are. [[Free email alerts here: prwatch.org ]] Meantime, here's one of my favorite commentators on this or any other subject, Molly Ivins, herself....... dfw.com Reality vs. public relations By Molly Ivins Creators Syndicate There is something faintly risible about the American habit of thinking we can fix problems through better public relations. We seem to think a positive mental attitude and high approval ratings can solve anything from shingles to famine. Global warming? Spin that puppy right out of existence. Economy bad? Send the Treasury secretary out to predict the creation of 200,000 new jobs a month -- that'll make everybody feel better. We have public relations firms that specialize in business disasters. Does one of your products turn out to kill people? Have you been putting asbestos in people's homes for years? Are you a notorious polluter? What you need is a good PR firm -- yes, my friends, a multimillion-dollar campaign to convince people that, despite your current problems, your firm is warm and cuddly, cares about the environment and supports the Boy Scouts. I am told that in Hollywood, there are PR people who specialize in repairing the damage to the reputations of movie stars who get nasty divorces and otherwise misbehave. Despite what I am sure are the invaluable services of the many PR people of our nation, sometimes it is actually smarter to attack the problem itself than the public relations surrounding it. I suspect that's where we are with the situation in Iraq. I have enjoyed the administration's PR offensive. The Bush White House's touching efforts to try to get the media to report that the glass is half-full rather than half-empty have yielded several nuggets of black comedy. George Nethercutt, a Republican congressman from Washington state, spent four days in Iraq and told an audience at home: "The story of what we've done in Iraq is remarkable. It is a better and more important story than losing a couple of soldiers every day." Major oops. "Let's ignore the dead soldiers" is not going to improve anything. The administration's efforts to spin the results of the conference in Madrid were equally unimpressive. Of the touted $18 billion pledged, only $4 billion is in grants -- the rest is loans. They want it back. President Bush has been touting the cheerful reports brought back by congressional delegations. Right. It's so secure in Iraq that the delegations spent their nights in Kuwait. A Washington Post story by Dana Millbank reports that the Pentagon is enforcing for the first time a policy that dates back to Persian Gulf War I: No pictures of flag-draped coffins. This is apparently an attempt to control what Gen. Hugh Shelton calls "the Dover test" -- the public reaction to photos of coffins that flow into Dover Air Force Base in Delaware. The Pentagon believes that public support for a military action is eroded by photos of coffins, so it's fixing that problem by stopping the photos. Reminding people of the real cost of Iraq, which is not in billions of dollars but in dead young Americans, seems to me something that the media have an obligation to do. However, the flag-draped coffin photo is only one way to do it. NewsHour With Jim Lehrer has been running photos of the faces of those who have been killed in complete silence at the end of the program. In another tragic triumph of reality over public relations, the al-Rashid hotel attack on Sunday "narrowly missed" Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, according to The Wall Street Journal. The attack injured 17 and killed a lieutenant colonel. The Financial Times reported that Wolfowitz was "shaken … unshaven, with his voice trembling shortly after the rocket attack." Not to wish ill on Wolfowitz, but he is the one who promised us that this war would be "a cakewalk" and that Iraqis would greet us with dancing and flowers. Ironic that he got a chance to see the real results. Since Bush declared our "mission accomplished" in Iraq, more than 200 American soldiers have died there, and thousands have been wounded. (The Department of Defense no longer gives out the number of wounded, like that's going to make it better.) That is not a public relations problem. That cannot be fixed by chipper reporting.

To: PartyTime who wrote (484311)	10/31/2003 8:07:54 AM
From: Selectric II	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

HAL has been building US military bases since Vietnam. It's been a government contractor doing this kind of stuff for just the past 40 years. Now I see how Duray drew the link. Cheney is more than 40 years old, Haliburton is more than 40 years old, and Iraq is more than 40 years old. CONSPIRACY! From the Center for Public Integrity's article, mis-cited earlier by Duray: "Halliburton discovered the benefits of government patronage when its support for U.S. President Lyndon Johnson resulted in several contracts, such as constructing military bases during the Vietnam War. In 1991, after the Persian Gulf War, then-Defense Secretary Cheney commissioned Brown & Root to conduct a study on the benefits of military outsourcing, paying the company an additional $5 million to update the report months later. In 1992, Brown & Root was awarded the U.S. Army's first Logistics Civil Augmentation Program contract, an omnibus contract that allows the Army to call on KBR for support in all of its field operations, including combat, peacekeeping and humanitarian assistance. LOGCAP is a "cost plus award fee" contract, meaning that KBR is paid a fee above the cost of the service ranging from two percent to five percent, depending on performance. When the Army needs a service performed, it issues a "task order," a sort of minicontract that outlines the tasks the contractor needs to perform. When the United States joined NATO forces in the Balkans in 1995, KBR was deployed to the Balkans. KBR lost a second five-year LOGCAP contract—awarded to DynCorp in 1997— after the General Accounting Office reported in February 1997 that KBR had overrun its estimated costs in the Balkans by 32 percent (some of which was attributed to an increase in the Army's demands). Despite these findings, KBR was awarded a new contract for Balkan logistical support that ran through May 1999. In September 2000, the GAO released another report claiming the Army had not reined in contractor costs, placing the total cost of the Balkan contract at $2.2 billion. Still, KBR beat out DynCorp and defense giant Raytheon for the third LOGCAP contract in December 2001, which is renewable for 10 years. Though LOGCAP's total value is undefined since services are provided in response to changing military needs, as of Sept. 21, 2003, KBR had been awarded 67 task orders totaling $2.2 billion—more than $2 billion for Iraq alone. LOGCAP does not comprise all of the company's military contracts. For example, it was awarded another LOGCAP-type contract with the U.S. Navy in April 2001, spanning five years and potentially worth $300 million. That contract, too, was awarded over the protests of the General Accounting Office, which questioned the criteria used to evaluate bidders. Iraq contracts In the competition for the current LOGCAP contract, the Army Corps of Engineers asked competitors to develop a contingency plan for extinguishing oil well fires in Iraq. The Army chose KBR's plan in November 2001, though it remains classified. On March 24, 2003, the Army announced publicly that KBR had been awarded five task orders in Iraq potentially worth $7 billion to implement the plan. One of the task orders, obtained by the Center for Public Integrity, required KBR to "procure, import and deliver" fuels to Iraq. In fact, the contract was awarded more than two weeks earlier, without submission for public bids or congressional notification. In their response to Congressional inquiries, Army officials said they determined that extinguishing oil fires fell under the range of services provided under LOGCAP, meaning that KBR could deploy quickly and without additional security clearances. They also said that the contract's classified status prevented open bidding. "...