Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brian Sullivan who wrote (14674)	10/31/2003 6:56:53 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 793609

I like 13, but I like it because it stopped rapacious assessors that were operating bfore it. 1.5%? Fine. I've got no problem with that- -if it stays at that. And assessments don't go berserk as they were when 13 was passed. I think that California voters would do themselves a big favor by voting for a few Republicans for jobs like State Treasurer even if the candidate is pro-life. It's not like the State Treasurer is going to change this law. Actually, that's true of the governor too. A President can't change Roe v. Wade; how can a governor? Nevertheless, it remains a litmus test for many.