SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ralfph who wrote (23444)11/2/2003 1:28:21 AM
From: Michael Bidder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39344
 
Hay Ralphy,

Why the contempt for such a good surface showing? What’s the agenda?

IMA has 13 million in cash with the warrants, little or no property payments, over 30 good properties, and ONE HELL OF A Good drill target in Patagonia. Fight is on already to claim it, and the drilling hasn't yet started.

My HOPE that the dirty tricks machine gets bankrupted.



To: ralfph who wrote (23444)11/2/2003 10:13:19 AM
From: jrhana  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39344
 
<RE AQI and IMR . I wonder how much of the cash that was ear marked for exploration is now getting sucked up in legal fees ?>

I imagine this thing will be settled and fairly soon as both companies are aware of the above.

They need to lock the top executives from both companies in a small, poorly ventilated room with a dirty bathroom, a coffee pot and some stale sandwiches. Nobody is allowed out of the room until the agreement is hammered out.

Both stocks will then run.



To: ralfph who wrote (23444)11/2/2003 4:20:42 PM
From: Elizabeth Andrews  Respond to of 39344
 
jrhana and I held hands for a while on the SWG. I was long a bit strictly because a friend knew a freind who knew...etc, you how it goes. I made a bit and I think he did as well. It has almost doubled since I sold it. I think that was a difficult one for many and only a small number of people really understood what it is and stayed with it.

You should have seen my date the other night!



To: ralfph who wrote (23444)11/3/2003 5:37:55 PM
From: Postman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39344
 
"""RE AQI and IMR - I wonder how much of the cash that was ear marked for exploration is now getting sucked up in legal fees?"""

So far I don't think it has cost either side much in legal fees has it?
There are no law suits as of yet-

--------------------
AQI is getting into a good buy range for me-
They have a drill indicated resource of 700,000 ounces (with silver credits) and their market cap is currently about $12 million U.S.

That puts the value of their resource at about $15.00 an ounce which is quite low IMO-

Also they are just starting an extensive drill program to try and increase the resource to 1 million ounces-



To: ralfph who wrote (23444)11/3/2003 7:20:23 PM
From: Michael Bidder  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 39344
 
ralph,

We don't need your or anyone else’s sexual innuendo on this board. Keep it clean. Where I was raised a Man was a Man and a Lady got respect. Now we live in a country were a man doesn't know what he is and a lady tries hard to be a man.

Woman make poor men and Men make even poorer woman!