To: KyrosL who wrote (14880 ) 11/10/2003 7:06:52 AM From: LindyBill Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793743 Here ya go, KL. Just what you have been saying! ________________________________ Success, Traced in Cement Iraqis Rebuild Factory at a Fraction of Estimate By Ariana Eunjung Cha Washington Post Staff Writer Monday, November 10, 2003; Page A01 SINJAR, Iraq -- The rumbling, rust-colored cement factory tucked into a valley in the northwest corner of the country here stands as a monument to the success of the reconstruction effort. Burned and looted in the aftermath of the war, it was up and running again by mid-September. But it was not put back together by the U.S.-led interim government and the fleets of contractors being paid billions of dollars to fix the country. In fact, had the plant managers gone the "American way," the factory might still be in pieces. U.S. Army engineers who came to survey the damage proposed rebuilding the plant into a shining showcase for the best in modern technology. They suggested buying a fleet of earth-moving equipment and importing machinery from Europe, estimating it would take $23 million and up to a year to complete the job. The Iraqis had more modest ambitions -- they just wanted to get the factory running again, even at minimal capacity. With the help of $10,000 from the U.S. military, and $240,000 left over in factory bank accounts, they used scrap electronics, tore up one production line to get parts for the other, and fixed the plant in three months. It was not the state-of-the-art facility that the Americans envisioned, but it got the job done. The difference between the "American way" and the "Iraqi way" of building things is at the heart of an ongoing debate about how much reconstruction money is really needed and how it should be doled out. As Congress debated $18 billion to rebuild Iraq, the cement factory became a symbol of the tension between the two approaches. "The Americans are trying to deal with us at an American level. But our businesses here, they work differently," said Mardeen M. Jazny, an entrepreneur from Baghdad who owns a small computer sales and service company. U.S. government officials say they must follow rules about how the money is to be spent so that what is built meets high standards, the bidding process is fair and taxpayer dollars are being used in the most efficient way possible. They say they intend to give Iraqi officials increasing authority over how the funds are disbursed. But members of the Iraqi Governing Council and other local leaders argue that the bureaucratic American process wastes money and time and that the country would be in much better shape if they were given a stronger voice in the process as soon as possible. Baghdad is not Bethesda, they say, and they question whether the grand plans of American contractors are necessarily the best thing for a country that is still struggling to get basic services up to prewar levels. The American way is one of surveys, blueprints, procurement orders, goggles and helmets. The companies file paperwork for practically every nail put in the walls and every piece of wood that is bought. The Iraqi way is more seat-of-the-pants. It is a world where deals are made on a handshake, where a rope and a piece of wood work just fine as a scaffold, and where most construction companies are groups of brothers and cousins and friends who decided to get together for a particular job. REST AT washingtonpost.com