Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Howard C. who wrote (486015)	11/3/2003 5:03:49 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

How about fingerprinting fingers, hey, I bet the real smart guys can do something so that might not work either. Do you support that? Self defense against tyranny for all paranoids, yes, I do understand, they are after you, defend yourselves. Do you understand that a lot of people laugh at you? You're a little too light upstairs for anyone to be worried about. Thanks for the non-effort at rebuttal.

To: Howard C. who wrote (486015)	11/5/2003 10:22:49 AM
From: Wayners	Respond to of 769667

John Dillinger actually tried that one. He tried to use acid to remove his fingerprints. The results made his fingerprints even more unique. There is another huge difference between fingerprints and ballistics. Fingerprints do not change over time and perpertrators can use gloves or wipe prints, but luckily a lot of perpertrators leave prints anyways. With the "ballistic fingerprinting" its like having every single perpertrator wearing a glove thus making the fingerprinting useless. If every perpertrator used gloves, I'd be againt fingerprinting too, but thats not how it is.