SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (177435)11/3/2003 9:25:49 PM
From: brian1501  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574518
 
Well, everybody else does.

No, only liberals who want to take a whole bunch of spending they "like" off the table of discussion.

All government spending is discretionary. Some spending is just more difficult to get rid of than other spending, but none of it is "off limits".

Brian



To: Road Walker who wrote (177435)11/4/2003 6:34:11 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574518
 
Well, everybody else does.

Not true.

Never know, he might have become our best friend again.

He was never our best friend. He was someone we used to try and work with. Not the same thing. Its possible that he could have become someone that we want to "try and work with" again, but it seems very unlikely.

No, I didn't say to stop keeping him in a box. That was a very successful strategy, and the evidence post war makes it even more compelling.

It was a holding strategy only, not one that would resolve the issue. And it was very costly in terms of causing Iraqi suffering. It was in place for years and might have been in place indefinitely causing more problems for Iraq then the invasion did. Or the strategy might have faded due to domestic or international politics, and Saddam would have gotten out of the box.

A little more focus on getting OBL, the real villain that attacked this country.

What would you do that we are not doing now?

Certainly the deficit problem wouldn't be as bad

True but its also true about all government spending.

certainly Bush would be more popular

Not certain at all.

Tim