Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GST who wrote (118441)	11/3/2003 10:45:03 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

France and Russia took the position that Iraq was not a WMD threat to the US -- and they were 100% correct. Did you even bother to read that article on the information Tarik Aziz is providing the US? He stated OUTRIGHT that he and Saddam had argued about the long-range missiles that Saddam was determined to build, despite being forbidden to possess them by the UN. Aziz stated that Saddam had determined his chemical/biological programs could easily be restored in short order, but he needed long-range missiles to deliver the warheads. And the French and Russians were willing to support this despot, even though he was in clear violation of the UNSC resolutions, and planning on violating even more should he ever get the opportunity to do so. Hawk