Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jackhach who wrote (486526)	11/4/2003 12:43:54 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

You can pretend to "ask" until your blue in the face-but your treasonous buddies will get 20% of the vote in 2004, and it's already sinking from there. That 20% or less is the answer to the anti-American revisionists. Their turn has come, after thirty years of treachery...

To: jackhach who wrote (486526)	11/4/2003 12:44:04 PM
From: JakeStraw	Respond to of 769670

You can't read?

To: jackhach who wrote (486526)	11/10/2003 12:49:17 PM
From: DavesM	Respond to of 769670

You can keep on asking the same questions, but the answers remain the same. re:"and again I ask -- where is the connection to 9-11? If Iraq was not even on this earth, never truly existed. 9-11 still would have happened." No direct connection between 9/11 and Iraq has been found yet (though there is a connection with the first World Trade Center attack), but there is a direct connection between Iraq and al Qaeda. If Iraq were never on the Earth, the United States would never had troops in Saudi Arabia, enforcing UN Sanctions and No Fly Zones over Iraq. No U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia, no 9-11. re: "Saudi Arabia should be attacked and invaded, NO?...and why not?" al Qaeda originally planned a more international group of terrorists for the 9/11 attacks. Bin Laden decided to change that to an operation of mostly Saudis.