Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (177524)	11/4/2003 7:38:21 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574589

Tim, re: Not true. Yes true, unless you are a nitwit trying to make some obscure point. re: He was someone we used to try and work with. Not true. He was someone we did work with. re: And it was very costly in terms of causing Iraqi suffering. And now they are doing so well, supported by the US taxpayer? If this was a humanitarian mission, it was a retro humanitarian mission. This was supposed to be DEFENSIVE, remember? You can't seriously still believe that SH was a threat to the US before the war. Now, yes, at least to US soldiers. re: What would you do that we are not doing now? I would have taken the ~200,000 troops that went to Iraq, blasted into the Pakistan mountains where he is hiding, and killed the son of a bitch. Probably with less casualties than we have had (so far) in Iraq. re: True but its also true about all government spending. Iraq is discretionary, incremental and unnecessary. John