Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (487030)	11/5/2003 1:13:03 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Deal with it, you cannot know that there were no WMD's, I do know because they can't find any. Even the lowliest gopher in the White House now admits there are no WMDs. In fact, Bush is planning to reassign those looking for WMDs to other tasks. And here you are still clinging to the hope that a nuke will be found hiding in someone's garden.......or someone will have a bottle of anthrax sitting in their ba'thist medicine cabinet. There are no WMDs. You deal with it! Osama just issued a warning for all Muslims to leave Washington DC and elsewhere, What news outlet is reporting that? I just did a search and nothing came up. Saddam may have passed things off for use in these places for all you know, and you do not know there is no link. Let me try this one more time...........there were sanctions on Iraq; inspectors were there until 1998 and they stated that at least 95% of the WMDs had been destroyed, maybe all. Flash forward 4 years.....Saddam told Bush he had destroyed all the WMDs; new inspectors went in and were not able to find any. Flash forward 11 more months. Saddam is toppled and we are all over Iraq, looking for WMDs, and guess what.......there are none. And yet, here you are stubbornly clinging to the notion that WMDs exist in Iraq and we fought the war for good reason. Your conclusions would be funny if they weren't so disturbing. You simply cannot factually say there is no linkage, nor no WMD's. Yes, I can.......read my lips. There are no WMDs. EOM. Clinton recognnizes that Saddam had WMD's, the U.N. recognizes it, France and Germany and Russia and Gephart and Lieberman recognnize it. I don't care of the Pope thinks its true. Its not! There are no WMDs! It was a lie perpetrated by your president! Why won't you come out of your fantasy world in which you believe you can prove negatives and declare lies have been told based upon the resulting false conclusions? Therapy is you only hope!

To: Dan B. who wrote (487030)	11/7/2003 9:57:44 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

"Saddam had WMD's, the U.N. recognizes it, France and Germany and Russia and Gephart and Lieberman recognnize it. " If France, Germany and Russia knew it and believed they were a threat, they would have joined in the invasion, wouldn't they? Perhaps they felt the data were not solid and therefore withheld support. And if Saddam had WMD, why didn't he use them against us???? This is a question no one seems to answer....

To: Dan B. who wrote (487030)	11/8/2003 12:25:22 AM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Saddam had nothing to do with Iraq and vice versa. Sadam might have had WMD's in 1999 or maybe not. One thing is for sure now. He didn't have them in 2002. And buishies all said for certain he did, which was their reason for war. That alone is enough reason to vote Bush out of office and insist the neocons disband and cleanse themselves. Such massive lies and mistakes cannot be tolerated in the US leadership. It's very-very expensive in too many ways.