SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (487350)11/5/2003 12:41:25 PM
From: JakeStraw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Al Sharpton wants to party with John Kerry's wife

Boston-AP -- Al Sharpton may be a minister, but Senator John Kerry still doesn't want him to get too cozy with Kerry's wife.

Democratic presidential candidates were asked by one of the young people at a Boston debate last night who they'd most like to "party with."

Al Sharpton said he'd like to hang out with Kerry's wife -- Teresa Heinz Kerry. So Kerry anwered the question by picking Sharpton. He says that's so he "can keep an eye on" his wife.

wqad.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (487350)11/5/2003 12:43:36 PM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 769670
 
Want Another 9/11? Elect Senator Ketchup

By Nicholas G. Jenkins,

Albert Einstein said that insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. Count then among the legion of insane Democrats presidential candidate John Kerry. At last Sunday night's presidential debate, the husband of condiment heiress Teresa Heinz described how a Ketchup Administration would deal with terrorists: "(t)his war on terror is far less of a military operation and far more of an intelligence-gathering, law enforcement operation."
Talk about insane.

Treating the war on terror as "an intelligence-gathering, law enforcement operation" instead of a military operation was American policy pre-9/11 and, if memory serves me, it didn’t go too well. President Clinton’s laissez faire “law enforcement operations” resulted in the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993, the Kobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, the attacks on American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, and the USS Cole. President Bush stayed the course, and then came September 11.

Treating the war on terror as a law enforcement operation doesn't work because terrorists aren't deterred by law enforcement. They're not even deterred by dying. There are only three ways to stop terrorists, and they all involve the military. The first is to create social, economic, and political conditions so people will have little incentive to choose terrorism (and its short life expectancy) as a vocation. You do that with democracy. Democracies breed hope, and hope is anathema to terror. That's why the Bush Administration is using the military to democratize Iraq.

The second way to combat terrorists is throw them in jail before they finalize plans with those seventy-two virgins. The Bush Administration knows this, which is why humanrightsniks have no shortage of clients at Guantanamo. It's also why we haven't been on the business end of a terrorist attack since September 11.

The third way is to kill them. This works best. Ask Uday and Qusay Hussein – oh wait, they’re dead.

The Wall Street Journal's editorialists heard Mr. Teresa Heinz’s proclamation as politician-speak that, if elected, he would withdraw American forces from Iraq "post haste." That would be insanity squared. Withdrawal would send a message to terrorists that when the going gets tough, the tough turn tail and run. Call it Vietnam and Somalia revisited. Only the most pollyanish peaceniks would believe Al Qaeda and their lot wouldn’t declare it open season on the paper tiger after that. The condiment king may as well hand sticks out to the terrorists and declare America the world's piñata.

None of this history is secret. It’s notorious and recent, so much so that academics haven’t had a chance to rewrite it yet. And if you believe Kerry and the Democratic cacophony, the world’s terror merchants are more boned up to kill Americans now than ever before. So why would Senator Ketchup do what history tells him not to? He’s no dummy – any guy who can marry into a $600 million fortune has to have something upstairs. I can think of only three plausible explanations. The first is that Kerry’s own aversion to bullets from his days in Vietnam is so acute that he considers avoiding wars more important than winning them. Fair enough, but not exactly a redeeming quality for a would-be commander in chief. (In case you’ve never heard the sound of Kerry’s voice, he did, indeed, serve in Vietnam. I hear bookies are accepting bets that, sometime before Super Tuesday, he will have a conversation without mentioning it. Current odds are 8-1.)

The second explanation is that Kerry is more concerned about America’s international reputation than he is with its domestic security. The French, in particular, seem particularly keen on seeing America act more like them. Bad idea. The French haven’t won a war since the French Revolution -- and they were fighting themselves!

The third explanation is that, to get to the left of Howard Dean, the French-looking candidate flat lied. Very possible, because lying is no sin in the Democratic Party. Ask the guy who didn’t have sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky.

Kerry isn't the only member of the Democratic Party who meets Einstein's definition of insane. Heck, their party principles – soaking the rich, throwing money at problems, eliminating racism by racializing everything -- are a compilation of craziness. A Republican-controlled Congress can undo those mistakes. Legislation always gets a second chance. But victims of terrorism don't. The 3,000 Americans who died at the hands of terrorists on 9/11 learned that lesson the hard way, and because of them, terrorists continue to feel the turned up heat. The American people would be – well, insane – to let Senator Ketchup turn it down now.



sierratimes.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (487350)11/5/2003 12:48:40 PM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 769670
 
Courting Bubba with bumper sticker rhetoric is lost cause

Kathleen Parker

November 5, 2003

As stereotypes go, few ignite the emotions as reliably as the Southern Pickup Truck With Confederate Flag. Just ask Dr. Howard Dean.

The Democrat front-runner opened ye unholy can of worms recently when he told an Iowa newspaper that he wanted "to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks." Dean made the remark by way of explaining his opposition to some gun-control legislation and as part of his Southern strategy of inclusiveness.

As in: "We can't beat George Bush unless we appeal to a broad cross section of Democrats," he explained to the Des Moines Register.

And, "White folks in the South who drive pickups with Confederate flag decals on the back ought to be voting with us and not them because their kids don't have health insurance, and their kids need better schools, too," he said at a Democratic National Committee meeting in February.

In the wake of Dean's most recent remarks, a veritable maelstrom of Bubba-ness has ensued. You'd have thought Dean had invoked Satan by the reaction of the other Democratic candidates, who began jockeying for Most Virtuous and made literal the politics of bumper sticker slogans.

John Kerry accused Dean of being "craven," and pandering to the National Rifle Association.

"I'd rather be the candidate of the NAACP than the NRA, who understands that the Confederate flag belongs in museums."

Richard Gephardt issued a statement saying he'd rather "be the candidate for the guys with American flags in their pickup trucks."

Oh, yeah? Well, the Rev. Al Sharpton said he'd rather confront people who "wave the Confederate flag," not embrace them.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman's spokesman said Dean's remark was "irresponsible and reckless." John Edwards, a North Carolinian, said that "to assume that Southerners who drive trucks would embrace this symbol is offensive."

And George Bush, who drives a pickup truck, said: "Who?"

This amusing display of Bubba one-upmanship proves only one thing: When it comes to yahoo-ism, nobody can accuse the South of hogging the market. Southern boys who drive pickup trucks - with or without flag decals - are wondering what these guys are talking about, if they're wondering at all.

Living in rural South Carolina, I'm surrounded by pickup trucks and, I reckon, good ol' boys. Yeah, sure nuf, we get together every sundown at the corner Esso to shuck corn, swat flies, chaw tobacco and flirt with our cousins while swapping tall tales about Gen. Sherman's mysterious overnight with Miss Liza's great-grandmama and how her house miraculously survived the Yankee fires. Wee-dawgies.

But I'll be gall-durned if I can remember the last time I saw a Confederate flag - on a truck or off it, as we say in the sticks. Rednecks, short for Dean's "White folks in the South who drive pickups with Confederate flag decals," are not indigenous to the South, as any visitor to rural Vermont or Massachusetts knows.

We've still got a few Confederate reminders around, and you can find a flag if you hunt for one. But the South is so inundated with out-of-state license plates and accents, it seems weirdly out of tune to discuss the region's demographics in terms of pickup trucks and battle flags.

The whole episode smacks of classism if not racism: Northern Nobility embraces Southern Idiocracy. How long before one of them says: "Why some of my best friends are Southerners"?

I don't have much use for the Confederate flag and wrote three columns urging that the flag be removed from the South Carolina statehouse dome. It seemed inappropriate to fly such a divisive symbol over a public property.

But the Confederate flag is tricky among Southerners - a volatile issue, the nuances of which are often lost on Northerners and other visitors to the kudzu states. Not everyone with the battle flag in his home or on his truck is a dangerous racist, though some are. Plenty of sticker-free Trans-Am drivers in New York are, too, not that I have anything against Trans-Ams.

For many others - well-educated, prosperous, thoughtful Southerners, as opposed to the undereducated, uninsured, vacant-staring Walker Evans sharecroppers Dean apparently envisions - the Confederate flag is a symbol of Southern history, of battles fought and lost, of family members valiant and dead, of a person's right to express himself even if it offends others.

Gephardt, Dean, Lieberman and Kerry probably needn't waste too much time trying to court the Southern pickup crowd. Most I've seen - with American or Confederate flags on them - also have another sticker on their bumpers. It's red, white and blue and says: Bush.

townhall.com