Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (177564)	11/5/2003 7:44:17 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574005

The only way I have seen home grown insurgencies stopped completely is through near total eradication. Yes. Esp. if like this one they are not broad based insurgencies but even when they are. I don't think you are correct that this one is not broad based. Examples - Malaysia, Bolivia, Argentina, Uruguay, US in the Philippines. Even with the US in Vietnam the anti-insurgency campaign was far more successful then most people realize and that was a borad based insurgency, with a lot of foregin support for the insurgents, and declining American support for the war. - Total eradication is near impossible; case in point, the Philippines. " Guerrillas and the Vietnam War Within the United States, the Vietnam War is commonly thought of as a guerrilla war. However this is a misleading simplification of a much more complex situation which followed the pattern outlined by Maoist theory. The Viet Cong or "VC" used guerrilla tactics in the early phases of the war. However, by 1965 when American involvement escalated, the Viet Cong were in the process of being supplanted by regular units of the North Vietnamese Army. If this is true, then our eventual retreat in failure is even more discouraging. ted