Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (4372)	11/6/2003 8:22:00 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

It would have been great, from our perspective, I guess. But we really don't have any business getting rid of the leaders of other countries, do we? What if other countries want to get rid of our leaders? How do you feel about that? I'm sure many countries would like to get rid of Mr. Bush- should that be an option for them?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (4372)	11/6/2003 8:27:36 AM
From: Dale Baker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20773

So after decades of lying to the international community as one of Saddam's righthand guys and chief henchmen, Aziz had a sudden honesty attack and should be relied on over the flat out denials from Paris and Moscow that this ever happened? Why don't the posts that repeat Aziz's charges include the denials? When did you decide to start trusting top officials from a nasty dictatorship? Plenty here that doesn't add up. Ever consider that Saddam loyalists have everything to gain by dividing the international community as much as possible right now? Blaming anyone else for the US going to war without real provocation is clumsy at best. It's sad to see the constant evasion of responsibility by so many political voices in the US now. Anything that goes wrong must have been someone else's fault. It's childish.