SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (488143)11/6/2003 11:29:58 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Respond to of 769667
 
"THE 2004 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS"

Subject 54388

GZ



To: American Spirit who wrote (488143)11/6/2003 11:35:04 AM
From: jackhach  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
I'm telling ya' AS -- don't even debate the subject (abortion) with them. Its a hollowed-out, trip-up issue with no legislative, real-world value. Abortion will NEVER be overturned -- it won't have to be due to ever-improving technology/developments/prevention delivery & methodology.

In addition, if we had 9 Anthony Scalia types on the USSC -- it would not ultimately do anything. They can't. Do you think they are going to arrest young teens and their doctors. Talk about turning back the clocks.

So in summary -- FORGET ABOUT IT!

-JH



To: American Spirit who wrote (488143)11/6/2003 11:39:46 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 769667
 
washingtonpost.com
The Boston Globe's Scot Lehigh gives Dean a mixed report card after the debate and before he expressed his regret:

"Dean's point is easily understood: He believes that cultural issues keep a significant number of Southerners voting Republican when their economic interests lie with the Democrats. And there is no reason to think him a bigot.

"Still, the blunt Vermonter occasionally displays dangerous symptoms of foot-in-mouth disease -- and last night he made that condition worse by refusing to regret a poor choice of words.

"That betrays a stubborn streak that is a distinct detriment in a candidate. Edwards, on the other hand, showed an impressive ability in his political cross-examination of Dean."