Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rick McDougall who wrote (488795)	11/7/2003 10:41:51 AM
From: Dan B.	Respond to of 769670

Re: "why would tejek have to prove that there is no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?" Simply because it is HE who claims there surely are none. We already knows there WERE WMD's in Iraq. I do NOT have it backwards. We already know(i.e. had proven), furthermore, that the whereabouts and disposition of those wmd's was withheld by an actively sneaky Saddam. The existence of such weapons and bad intent for America in Iraq is, frankly, not even in question, simply the whereabouts of previously KNOWN weapons. The PRIOR evidence is all I need to prove the existence of WMD's. Current evidence of Saddam's bad intent(key to the self-defense justification I/we/America claims) includes the very fact that KNOWN WMD's have obviously been hidden and/or spirited away into the hands of....??! Re: "can you prove that Bush & his cronies were not behind 911?" No, of course I can't, silly! That would be attempting to prove a negative, which again, can't be done(though tejek hasn't recognized this simple fact yet as he continues to wrongly believe it is proven that there are no WMD's in IRAQ). Dan B.