Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (159630)	11/7/2003 12:39:51 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

But yes, if national party goes down the road the CA party has gone, they will become irrelevant. And I think Lizzie would agree with that. Hell, even I'd agree with that. Well, maybe not quite "irrelevant", but highly polarizing and alienating, with shrinking national support. That's the party Pat Buchanan wanted. As for CA, perhaps Arnold as Gov can swing the state party toward the center. If he can, CA could become a GOP stronghold and influence the national party as well. After all, if you grab the middle in CA, you leave the Dems with SF, Berkeley, and a few pockets like Hollywood and Santa Barbara (is it still "the People's Republic of"?). It becomes the party of Barbara Streisand and becomes irrelevant, while the far right is left to choose between splintering off and becoming irrelevant themselves or working with the middle. OK, maybe that's a little far-fetched. The middle also likes to have political power somewhat balanced, I think. Bob