SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : IVAN - Ivanhoe Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PashaBear who wrote (28)11/8/2003 10:59:59 PM
From: Pluvia  Respond to of 271
 
Thom Calandra, CBS Marketwatch and IVAN - Exposing the TRUTH

Message 19480731

This thread is dedicated to the investigation of Thom Calandra, his pay stock service "The Calandra Report", his “questionable” reporting of public companies he owns (IVAN), and Calandra’s position with CBS Marketwatch which is - according to the CBS Marketwatch site:

marketwatch.com

Thom Calandra is the founding editor of CBS MarketWatch and currently serves as the Chief Commentator.

We find it both interesting, and disturbing that CBS and CBS Marketwatch allow Mr. Calandra to uses the CBS Marketwatch site and his CBS television appearances to report and enthusiastically recommend buying stocks (such as IVAN) that Caladara owns.

We find it even more disturbing that Calandra is allowed to continue shameless stock pumps after CBS Marketwatch’s General Legal Counsel is provided facts that strongly suggest Calandra is either a party to stock manipulation or that he has failed miserably to do any objective research on the companies he feverishly touts.

The purpose of this thread is to discuss and present the facts surrounding this issue to the public.

All comments are the EXPRESS opinion of the Author(s) - All rights reserved.



To: PashaBear who wrote (28)11/8/2003 11:01:36 PM
From: Pluvia  Respond to of 271
 
i'm going to start with the subject of using what appears to be inside information to pump the stock of IVAN... and include facts that suggest Thom Calandra and CBS Marketwatch have failed to provide objective journalistic reporting on (IVAN), stocks their TV commentators own personally and stand to benefit by promoting...

What does CBS Marketwatch's General Legal Counsel Doug Appleton do when he's informed of a problem?


Subject 54392

pull up your seats and feel free to contribute or comment...

All comments are the EXPRESS opinions of the author(s) - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

cheers

steve pluvia



To: PashaBear who wrote (28)11/8/2003 11:04:43 PM
From: Pluvia  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 271
 
Mineral Companies - Background...

Subject 54392

To invest in a development stage mineral company, or "Juniors" as they're known in Canada, you MUST be able to trust management.

Why? Because the value of a development stage mineral company is simply put, minerals that company's management claims are in a chunk of property.

1. You must be able to trust that management actually has rights to the subject property; and,

2. That the study done to establish the minerals was accurate, not fraud; and,

3. That the study was properly engineered to determine the size of the mineral deposit, and the minerals can be extracted and brought to market economically.

I have found that fraud in development stage mineral companies is rampant. In my experience, over many, many years of investing, more than 9 out of 10 development stage mineral companies were frauds or failures.

All involved significant promotion, often the minerals were located in distant exotic lands... Management always claimed the size of the deposit was mind boggling. In my experience, most were clear fraud and management was responsible a majority of the time.

Fraudulent studies are common place; honest mistakes occur regularly; minerals are often not found where they should be. Perhaps oil is found, but it's not possible to extract economically, without for example a pipeline that can't be built due to feuding warlords. The stories are endless, but a common thread prevails...

In development stage mineral companies, you must be able to trust management's claims when they say "we have a property, it has these minerals, and we can extract them economically".

Can we trust IVAN management when they make claims about IVAN's minerals properties? Does IVAN's management tell the truth? Do they exaggerate the truth? Do they try to make a worthless property look valuable so they can sell stock and raise money?

I have a number a historic and current HARD facts that suggest IVAN Management do not tell the truth about mining properties.



To: PashaBear who wrote (28)11/8/2003 11:05:53 PM
From: Pluvia  Respond to of 271
 
THE EVIDENCE AGAINST IVAN & THOM CALANDRA #1

Subject 54392

Question:

1. Can you trust IVAN Management?
2. How - (why?) did Thom Calandra miss this while he shameless pumped IVAN - the stock he personally owns?


Robert Friedland FYI appears for all intensive purposes to be and run IVAN...

abc.net.au

"Duplessis: When Galactic started out its primary property was a really worthless piece of ground in Oregon, one of the US north-western States, on which Friedland claimed a mysterious Hindu had appeared out of the mist one day, and pointed out a large, rich gold-bearing lunker to one of the geologists, as if by precognition. This stone, in Friedland mythology, became known as The Hindu Stone, and based upon this, and prospects that this would be a very rich gold mine, the Warner Mine was the main focus at the beginning of Galactic; it acquired some other properties in Oregon, none of which panned out to be worth much of anything. It acquired a property in Alaska, or interest in a property in Alaska called the Yacobie Island on which Friedland claimed it had metals worth over $600-million US, and a number of projects went in and out between the '82 period and 1984, when it finally settled on the property which was to become its real claim to fame and its claim to infamy, which was a piece of ground, on the top of a Mountain in Colorado, which was known as the Summitville property or site.

And there Friedland and his company constructed a heap leach cyanide mining operation, whereby you crush the stones and you spray cyanide over top of these rocks to leach out the gold and this method was to supposedly make economic an ore body that a major mining company, Anaconda, had dropped and rejected as being not economic.

So Galactic, with the Summitville Mine, started hyping and talking about all this gold production and what it was doing, and for a period from 1985 about, to 1990, was the main centre of focus, Galactic talked up and raised millions, hundreds of millions of dollars, for this operation in Colorado, and then some subsequent properties they acquired in the Philippines and in South Carolina.

But Summitville was the beginning, and it rode the stock from as it had been pennies a share to a high of CA$36 a share, and all the way back down to pennies, and eventually into bankruptcy.

And as it was learned in the 1990s, almost the week that production began in Colorado at the Summitville Mine, cyanide began leaking from the site and polluting the surrounding environment. And by 1992, it reached such a disastrous state after six years of continuous pollution and regulatory environmental violations, that the EPA - the Environmental Protection Agency, the American Government agency - stepped in. It was declared one of the ten top toxic waste sites in North America, and they've been working to clean it up and reclaim the site ever since, at a cost of well over $US 100 million to the American people."

usdoj.gov

The settlement calls for Mr. Friedland to pay the federal government and the State of Colorado $27,750,000 over the course of the next ten years. Friedland was the president at various times of three now bankrupt corporations, Summitville Consolidated Mining Company, Inc., Galactic Resources, Inc., and Galactic Resources, Limited...



To: PashaBear who wrote (28)11/9/2003 12:07:19 AM
From: Pluvia  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 271
 
THE EVIDENCE AGAINST IVAN & THOM CALANDRA #2 (pg 1 of 2)

Hired Mercenaries used to kill locals and rape diamond mines?

abc.net.au

Question:

1. Can you trust IVAN Management?
2. How - (why?) did Thom Calandra miss this while he shameless pumped IVAN - the stock he personally owns?


For me, if the Executive Outcomes mercenaries hadn't landed in Papua New Guinea, I probably wouldn't have paid much attention to Robert Friedland. Get ready then, to follow a bit of a mystery maze, through a tangled and complex web of companies and associations.

Last year I'd presented a story on Executive Outcomes activities in Africa: how they provided security, and much more, on diamond leases in Angola and Sierra Leone. They were contracted by an English company called Branch Energy. They also did work for an Australian-US company called Sierra Rutile. So with the same mercenaries now in Papua New Guinea, in the last few weeks I checked what had happened to Branch Energy since last year. It seems when Branch Energy wanted to raise finance to expand, they headed for Canada, where they made contact with Robert Friedland. And late last year, Diamondworks - a company closely associated with Friedland - bought Branch Energy.

So are there any other Papua New Guinea links, direct or indirect, to Friedland or Diamondworks?

Background Briefing checked records listed at the Vancouver Stock Exchange, where Diamondworks is listed as a company. One name stood out: Colonel Tim Spicer, Head of Sandline International, currently residing at the British High Commission in Port Moresby.

Last October, Tim Spicer, of 535 King's Road, London, the address of Sandline International and Branch Energy, was granted 10,000 options to buy shares in Diamondworks.

Other people from the same address were also granted options. One of them was Tony Buckingham, now known to have been at the Cairns meeting last April with Tim Spicer and Papua New Guinea officials.

Tony Buckingham, the Head of Branch Energy, was granted 125,000 options. He's also a Director and principal shareholder of the Friedland associated company, Diamondworks. The granting of Diamondworks stock options to Tim Spicer and other mining and mercenary company employees, illustrates more than corporate generosity.

The options were granted under a section of the Securities Act of British Columbia, in Canada, which states that such options are granted to Directors and employees. And that includes - and this is a quote - "certain persons who although in form are independent contractors, in substance are employees."

And in February this year, Eben Barlow, the Head of Executive Outcomes in South Africa, became a shareholder in Diamondworks.

At the same time as Spicer and Buckingham were discussing a contract with the Papua New Guinea Government, Buckingham was well into discussions with Robert Friedland and his brother Eric, about arranging for Diamondworks to take over Branch Energy and its lucrative diamond leases in Africa.

cont'd