SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: T L Comiskey who wrote (31167)11/7/2003 7:32:45 PM
From: laura_bush  Respond to of 89467
 
Krugman mainstream prime time news: tonight on MSNBC and CNBC.

The News with Brian Williams.

He minces few words.

Go Paul Krugman!

Hurray!!!!!!!!!!

lb



To: T L Comiskey who wrote (31167)11/8/2003 12:10:35 AM
From: laura_bush  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
In the Bush Hates the Environment department:

Missouri River Scientists Pulled from Project

By LIBBY QUAID, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - The long-running dispute over management of the
nation's longest river took another twist when the Bush administration
yanked government scientists off a project to study the waterway's
ecosystem.

The team had been on the job for years and was within weeks of
producing what could have been its final report. Conservation groups
criticized last week's unreported decision to remove the scientists, which
they said was to protect business interests at the expense of the
Endangered Species Act.

The move may block changes to the Missouri River's flow, because the
scientists had ordered the switch. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
has resisted changing river operations but is under a December deadline
to come up with a new plan that meets requirements of the Endangered
Species Act.

A different team of scientists at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will
say whether the corps can avoid major changes — such as a previously
ordered switch to a more natural spring rise and low summer flow — and
remain in compliance with the act.

It's the latest development in a bitter battle over managing the nation's
longest river, which stretches 2,341 miles from Montana to St. Louis,
where it empties into the Mississippi.

Conservation groups accused the administration of trying to avoid
changing to a more seasonal ebb and flow to benefit birds and fish.

"In a month's time, a group of people that knows nothing about the
Missouri are supposed to write a credible biological opinion? Give me a
break," Chad Smith, spokesman for the group American Rivers said
Wednesday.

The Fish and Wildlife Service said critics were jumping to conclusions.

"Obviously, that's prejudging what's going to happen here, and there has
been no prejudgment of what's going to happen here," said Hugh
Vickery, spokesman for the Interior Department, which includes the
service. "The bottom line is, this will go where the science leads. There
is no predetermination."

He said one of the new team leaders, Robyn Thorson, is regional director
of the Service's Minnesota-based Great Lakes-Big Rivers region, which
includes a portion of the Missouri. The other leader is Dale Hall, regional
director of the agency's Southwest Region in Albuquerque, N.M.

The old team of scientists said three years ago the Missouri needs a
more natural spring rise and low summer levels to comply with the
Endangered Species Act, and their findings were confirmed by the
National Academy of Sciences (news - web sites). Current operations
were put into place before the river's sturgeon and shorebird species
made the government's threatened and endangered species list.

The corps resisted, and the Bush administration postponed the changes.
It now is seeking a new "biological opinion" from the wildlife service.

story.news.yahoo.com