Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (177786)	11/13/2003 1:52:38 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575146

This is what I meant by your getting caught up in the semantics at the expense of the main point of the article. When the main arguement for a major point is expressed in such a way that it doesn't make any sense it is a critical flaw in the article and bringing it up isn't just playing games with semantics. The real question is why was the "statistically significant" data blacked out. The article doesn't answer that question. Really the only person who can answer it is the person who did the blacking out. You can assume the worst motivation, or you can give the Justice Department the benefit of the doubt, or you can admit the reality that we really don't know. Discrimination and AA are just part of the issue. In three short years, the Bush administration has developed a history of withholding important information. OK. I was dealing with this as part of the AA and discrimination debate. If your main point in posting about it is to indicate the the Bush adminsitration is a bit too secretive then I would probably join you in that opinion. Tim