Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (78836)	11/8/2003 1:44:19 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"Yes, some of their decisions will be morally repugnant, but it's better than having the feds write a lot of rules that will work poorly if they work at all." I don't think the idea of some people making morally repugnant choices is the real fuse here, although those are the decisions that mostly fund the court system. Some people will make choices that are self serving and with malicious intent toward the assistee. With out a rule how would we determine which was which. I agree that when we try to make a lot of rules to sort it out, we end up with more irresolvable legal cases than ones that we can settle. That's why I like one rule...don't do it.