Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (6317)	11/8/2003 9:55:45 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10965

AS, Careful, my friend. Lying on behalf of your candidate is likely to backfire. You are very disappointing to me, mouthing the very lies of the right wing when you say that Dean's intelligent plan to undo the evil tax giveaway to the rich is a "tax hike". It is nothing of the sort. It is a return to fiscal sanity. You also grossly misrepresent Gov. Dean's position on national defense. He's no pacifist, as you so desperately try to paint him. He's for a sensible foreign policy based on diplomacy and multilateralism, with our military held as a last resort. What he opposes, sensibly, is the criminal activities of the Bush mafia. Unlike the waffling acquiescence to terrible foreign policy emanating from a weakling like John Kerry. Where was John Kerry when he could have proven that he really opposed the Bush crimes by voting against the $87 Billion giveaway to Halliburton and Bechtel? Kerry, the yellow-belly, was hiding in the cloakroom with 45+ other weaklings from the Democratic Party. Only Robert Byrd had the decency and integrity to stand up and be counted when the vote came down to give away the U.S. treasury to the thieves of Baghdad, the American corporate Ali Babas. In 1993, President Clinton hoped for a $20 Billion package of aid for our cities and states for rebuilding. He was turned down by the Congress. Now the Congress, by a secret voice vote decides to lavish $87 Billion on Iraq? What's wrong with this picture?