Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (490006)	11/10/2003 1:25:28 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 769670

You really don't care about proof, to you the folks you disagree with must always be lying. You need to hear this hear clearly. First comes the lie, then comes my criticism. It's sick, IMO. What's sick.......the experience of J. Lynch used as propaganda by the military? Will Jessica say she was ordered not to tell her story, and that she was kept out of public view against her will rather than by her request? If so, there will be plenty of mad media folks, not the least of which are at Fox news(lol). You are making no sense. She just came out with her book. As for your denunciation of me as a Libertarian, it is yet another simplistic reactionary comment of little ado to anything. Though you will call me into question as a bullying knave does, When did I do that? I can tell you that the only time I voted for a Republican President was my vote for Gerald Ford in '76, and my first Presidential vote was for Schmidt?(IND/Libertarian) in '72. You can write unfounded crap about me like "you are" this, that, or tight with the devil, if you like, but you cannot make it so anymore than you can prove Bush lied(by your own tacit admission). Bush lied and you are conservative in spite of who you voted for in 1972.......or in 1982 or 1992.

To: Dan B. who wrote (490006)	11/10/2003 4:36:32 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

but you cannot make it so anymore than you can prove Bush lied(by your own tacit admission). What constitutes proof? Do statements made by senior leaders in w's administration represent distortions of his adminsitration and by inference him directly, particularly when he does not condemn them ? Is a distortion or an exageration to be forgiven as the mis-step of a leader lacking the flair for detail (admittedly a trait of the man) or representative of an intent to deceive people or influence a desired outcome ? Scott Peterson will probably be sentenced to death or life on the basis of circumstantial evidence alone. Al