SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (490030)11/10/2003 2:50:42 AM
From: Dan B.  Respond to of 769670
 
Re: "You guys are the epitome of deceit. You cut my sentence above, and in effect, change its tone to suit your purposes."

AWWWWW, LOL. Now THERE's a pot calling shiny silver black, LOL. I answered your question as I'd stated my thoughts in the first place. It was your QUESTION which implied that I might have thoughts opposing what I myself had indicated. What a word twisting knave you are, accusing me when you are at root, solely guilty.

Re: "And what about your failure to answer my questions? Clearly not a concern of yours, huh?"

Oh, believe me, I'll take the record to defend myself on that charge as it stands, LOL.

Re: "Do you really think you answered my question with the above? Let me pop your bubble.....you did not. You are good at ongoing dialogue but are a failure at communicating with another person."

Since I'm confident that anyone who read that could easily discern the clear answer within save you, I'll shorten it up for you: the answer is an emphatic YES, I think beyond Bush's thoughts(though he has never told me a thing, personally), though I say NO to the false implication that I have any tendency to listen to Bush in the main at all.

Re: "Yes, if that's what they want and they are willing to fight for it."

Great, Iraqi's are wanting it, and fighting for it now.

Re: "My statement is true....what does "surprise" have to do with it?"

Hey, you are both the one who asked me if I was "suprised," (I just re-posted that very question of yours, in case you'd forgotten), and the one who conveniently left it out just now. What a POS BS comment you offer, therefore.

Dan B.