Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (6392)	11/10/2003 12:35:35 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10965

Polls show an anti-war candidate cant win nationally. Despite the public's disapproval with the way Bush handled the war (rushing in alone with no peace plan) they generally admire his guts for standing up to Saddam. Those on the left don't care, but swing-voters are not going to hold it against Kerry or anyone else for voting conditionally on the war powers act. And Bushies are hypocritical for criticizing anyone who did. Yes, Dean's anti-war stance gives him a left-wing base and he's un-opposed there, but that which helps Dean with the left hurts him nationally. If you take the support for all four candidate who voted for the war powers and put them together, they swamp Dean about 50% to 15%. Kerry's problem is strictly in New Hampshire and now he's taking care of that. Hopefully it's not too late.

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (6392)	11/10/2003 6:50:09 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10965

Glenn, Who authored that particular analysis of Kerry the candidate? I agree with you that it is "an excellent analysis".