Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The new NFL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (4984)	11/11/2003 11:43:39 AM
From: Oral Roberts	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90596

Yes that would be accurate.

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (4984)	11/11/2003 11:46:19 AM
From: sandintoes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90596

Atlanta does that almost every week..we can all start wearing paper bags over our heads when we go to the games... I don't think Reeves will be staying after this year...he finally got his 200 win, but the fans boo him when he comes out...not a good sign for a coach.

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (4984)	11/11/2003 1:49:08 PM
From: Original Mad Dog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90596

I thought the Pack defense looked good during much of the game. Still you're looking at 8-8 or 9-7, which likely isn't gonna be enough. The only scenario I see that gets the Pack into the playoffs easily is a loss at TB this week and then running the table (4 easy games against CHI, DET, SD, and OAK and 2 cold Lambeau games against DEN and SF). Not likely but could happen if the D plays well and God stays healthy. The other possibility is winning 5 of those last 6 and depending on Minnesota to lose. Minnesota's schedule is tougher in that they have to play the Rams, Seahawks, and Chiefs, and they have lost 3 in a row already. If they lose those three tough games and drop another to a mediocre team like the Bears, they're 9-7 and lose the tiebreaker to the Pack. It ain't over.