Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (490911)	11/11/2003 3:48:43 PM
From: MSI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Gore as president would likely have done what he said he was going to do. A bickering Republican Congress would have prevented "nation-building". He would not have immediately halted an investigation of 9/11, it would probably have had a Special Prosecutor, and let the chips fall where they may. World opinion would not have been squandered. Iraq wouldn't have been invaded, and inspectors allowed to do their job. Voting machines wouldn't have been replaced with computerized-fraud machines made by Republican companies. He would not have been allowed by his constituency to conceal presidential papers going back to Reagan, or Clinton. A tax-cut bill would have been limited to the income classes that benefit the economy with the most spending, which is the only part of the current tax plan working now, and which wasn't part of the GOP plan until the Dems forced it. To your point, Gore would have launched the alternative energy programs already planned when he was VP designed to free us from Bush-type dependence on military protection of our enemies. Had the "evildoers" launched the WTC attack, there would have been an expanded version of Clinton's retailitory attack, but likely without the airlift of hundreds of al Queada leaders to safety Pakistan, "accidentally". Thousands of lives and trillions of dollars difference, between the two.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (490911)	11/11/2003 3:54:02 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Well if that is true then I'd also guess we would have 8% plus unemployment. And I wonder what fuel and energy shortages we would be living with. At this time I'd say about a decade of research is still required to see if alternatives and a system can be created that will only have such fuels costing twice as much as current fuels. Total technology ignoramus post stupidity and have some need to suggest others are dishonest. The mentally retarded Cronyism mind on parade.