SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sun Tzu who wrote (119278)11/11/2003 5:44:16 PM
From: Jim Willie CB  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
here is what I know on Iraq and Romans
I believe about 6-8 weeks ago an article appeared which I read
it might have been a NYTimes article
might have been a Newsweek article
might have been a European Security source article
unsure

it mentioned how the Romans dealt with Iraqis in the 2nd century, I believe
all went well for 10-12 years
then all hell broke loose with ambushes and uprisings
guerrilla wars were not common back then
Romans fared poorly
eventually, after suffering considerable losses, the Romans abandoned the area

I remember the article like I read it yesterday
but not the source
if that invalidates the story in your mind, so be it
it does not in mine
but corroboration would be nice, regardless
the Romans dabbled ALL OVER THE PLACE, including Ireland and England
if they never bivouacked in Iraq over two centuries, I will eat my 2-day-old shorts
they were megalomaniacs, tried & true

/ jim



To: Sun Tzu who wrote (119278)11/12/2003 12:23:55 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
In the long wars between Rome and Parthia (they mostly fought over Armenia), Trajan took northern Mesopotamia in 116, but he died the following year and his successor Hadrian gave it back. That's about as much Roman control of Mesopotamia as there was.