Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mph who wrote (11967)	11/12/2003 10:59:59 AM
From: Oral Roberts	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14610

I wouldn't be surprised if many are floating around out there and young women should keep that in mind when boyfriend/husband wants some nudies. They need to give thought to what lover boy will do with those pictures down the road if spurned. First the US Army uses her as a propaganda piece and now this. I suppose her million bucks soothes the pain a bit but still.

To: mph who wrote (11967)	11/12/2003 11:03:31 AM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14610

Anyway, his contention was that virtually ALL women had nude photos somewhere and should therefore be sympathetic in a digital age it certainly does seem that way. andy warhol was right when he said everyone would get their 15 minutes fame... he neglected to point out though.. everyone would be naked. <g> somewhat more seriously, does it ever cross the mind of "the party naked and be sure to take my picture" the potential of blackmail or broader unauthorized dissemination of the pics or do they just not care, OR all they all just drunk at the time. just wondering

To: mph who wrote (11967)	11/12/2003 12:15:12 PM
From: Alan Smithee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14610

I was watching one of the news shows the other day, and there was a piece on about the "Girls Gone Wild" videos. It seems a woman is objecting to a video of her being included on the tape (and her picture being on the cover sleeve) and is suing the producer of the tape on a theory that the producer had appropriated her image for commercial gain. Huh? Seems to me she should have been a little more discreet before baring her chest in a drunken group of 300 people.