Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (267223)	11/13/2003 9:24:42 PM
From: Jeff Jordan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

"Hang'em first, try'em later" I guess were talking about two different things..... We all have to face a judge sometime, give oath and do our accounting before the court. We no matter what our religion must have faith that the judge holds truth and justice in equal esteem regardless of what the accused religious beliefs are. But the courts authority is given by the people for the protection of their rights and freedoms. Having a single Judge express his religious beliefs doesn't impose or deny anyones rights. I think he showed a respect for the law by acknowledging right and wrong or justice doesn't exist without God. ....I'll be humble and give it a break<g> Don't worry this will never be an Islamic state...they have their own real estate.<g> Just to make my position clear.<g> Goodnight..........don't let the boogie-man bite. ~j