Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pogeu Mahone who wrote (267276)	11/14/2003 10:28:03 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone	Respond to of 436258

November 14, 2003 FLOYD NORRIS Manager Prospered as Investors Suffered HO would have thought that Gary L. Pilgrim would seek to profit at the expense of the mutual fund shareholders whose trust had made him wealthy? As a star money manager during the 1990's, Mr. Pilgrim was a growth-at-any-cost investor. "I frankly don't believe that I've lost any serious money because of overvaluation," he said in 1996. Later, his customers would lose plenty. But Mr. Pilgrim did quite well. We now learn that a hedge fund in which he was an investor was making money from market timing trades in PBHG funds - including, according to one person briefed on the findings, the Growth Fund run by Mr. Pilgrim. The market-timing trades started in March 2000, just as the fund headed south, and continued through December 2001 while fund investors were losing billions. Old Mutual, a South African insurer that bought the PBHG funds near the top in 2000, said yesterday that Mr. Pilgrim would repay to the funds the money he - but not other investors in the hedge fund - made from those trades. Market timing trades can hurt long-term fund investors. They force fund managers to buy and sell stocks to keep up with the fund flows, thus raising fund expenses. They can allow investors who leap in and out to share in profits that were really earned by other investors' money. But they also increase investment advisory fees, which are based on fund assets. Until late 2001, PBHG did not try to discourage market timers. Was that because Mr. Pilgrim was profiting from such trades? Mr. Pilgrim and Harold J. Baxter, who approved the market timing, have now been forced out of the company they founded. They made hundreds of millions while investors lost billions. In March 1993, PBHG had one fund, with $6 million in assets. Seven years later, its 14 equity funds had $15.8 billion in assets. For the 11 years through March, investors in the PBHG stock funds lost a net $3.3 billion. Over the most recent eight years - earlier numbers were not available - the company collected $499 million in investment advisory fees. Half of that money came from the PBHG Growth Fund. Along the way, Mr. Pilgrim and Mr. Baxter found two ways to cash out. In 1995, they sold their management company to United Asset Management for stock in that company. They got to keep a share of the revenue from running the funds. Then in 2000, after Old Mutual took over U.A.M., it paid hundreds of millions to the men for their share of the revenue. It was in 1995, the year that U.A.M. made the men rich, that Mr. Pilgrim invested in the hedge fund. By 2000, Mr. Pilgrim was very rich. But he wanted more, and pushed to let the hedge fund do market timing trades. All too often, it now appears, mutual fund managers viewed fund investors as chickens to be plucked. The current scandals involve market timing and late trading, but there are other practices - still legal and still practiced by many funds - that are dubious. One is the shifting of expenses for such things as quotation terminals to the fund shareholders, rather than assuming that the millions paid for investment advice might finance such equipment. Another is the way funds make existing shareholders compensate brokers for selling the funds to new investors. Now we have the specter of competing law enforcement agencies. The Securities and Exchange Commission, which was asleep too long, appears to be serious about bringing reform. The settlement with Putnam Investments announced yesterday will produce governance changes before financial penalties are determined. But Eliot Spitzer, the New York attorney general, says he can do better. Amid the competition there is likely to be lots of noise and many accusations of wrongdoing. The risk is that squabbling regulators will slow the arrival of needed reforms. Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company \| Home \| Privacy Policy \| Search \| Corrections \| Help \| Back to Top