Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (79147)	11/14/2003 8:13:36 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"If there was real solid scientific evidence one way or the other I would think rational people would go with the scientific evidence but we have no such evidence." Whoa! That is not the way it is done. It is scientifically impossible to prove a negative. Therefore, there is absolutely no onus on the negative side to prove anything about Gods, unicorns, or invisible mice. There is an abundance of evidence for conditional beings. There has never been any evidence for an unconditional being. It is nonsense for a person to claim that the likelihood of 500 dimensions is the same as the likelihood of three or four merely because we can never give evidence that there are not 500 dimensions. We have very sound evidence that no mice have human hearts. We don't give the alternative view equal merit simply because there is no proof that no mice have human hearts.