Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (178010)	11/15/2003 9:22:38 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576639

Tim, re: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 All speculation. The fact is that every US president since WW2 has managed to get NATO support, and often troops, for their military adventures. And with a few exceptions, things have gone pretty well. This president, through arrogance and a total lack of diplomatic skill, managed to alienate a large percentage of our allies, and things are not going at all well. You can say that is coincidence or you can invent reasons why things would have been even worse with our allies support, but that's all speculation. If it's humanitarian, which seems to be the neocon post-justification du jour, then maybe you get NATO support. As our traditional allies read correctly, there was no immediate threat, no urgency. These are facts, not speculation. John