Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (493409)	11/16/2003 2:13:54 AM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

scumbag. She got it right. Fits you to a tee. Not that first time you've said crap like this, traitor. You like them so much? Why don't you go to Iraq and help them?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (493409)	11/16/2003 2:37:40 AM
From: Dan B.	Respond to of 769667

Re: "A January 11, 1999, Newsweek story ran under this headline: "Saddam + Bin Laden?" The story cited an "Arab intelligence source" with knowledge of contacts between Iraq and al Qaeda." Message 19505584 Re: "If George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Bend Franklin, John Hancock and the rest of our Founding Fathers were alive today and living in Iraq, they'd be on the side of the Iraqi freedom fighters. And they would see George Bush as just as autocratic, aristocratic and evil as we saw England's King." LOL. Ludicrous. Our founding fathers would definitely be on America's side(you don't have to long compare the constitution they gave us with the oppression suffered under Saddam in order to draw this conclusion). England was our long standing oppressor from without. In Iraq, Saddam was the long standing oppressor from within. Since the Iraqi people see it this way, your example is hopelessly flawed. Our efforts are making life better in Iraq. Iraqis are fighting beside us. Have any more fantasies? Dan B.