Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jackhach who wrote (493506)	11/16/2003 11:51:55 AM
From: John Chen	Respond to of 769670

Jackhach,re:"which is more serious?". Are you kidding? Of course a 'blow job' is more sensational than the 'blow up job' (shock and awe). Close your eyes for a moment, add some imagination .... now open your eyes ... see, isn't it obvious that which one is more serious.

To: jackhach who wrote (493506)	11/16/2003 12:03:16 PM
From: jim-thompson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Democraps need to have Howard Dean take this test. They already have found out he wants to be a redneck confederate waving flag candidate. ananova.com

To: jackhach who wrote (493506)	11/16/2003 12:15:09 PM
From: AK2004	Respond to of 769670

re: Clinton lies about a BJ that is all he did over his 8 years? lets start from the beginning and do comparative analysis: you keep screaming that Bush stole election while he won. You are forgetting that about Clinton health plan that allow him to win over Bush Senior. It was outrageously idiotic and yet Americans bought into it. Politicians do lie but that was a bit too much When Bush Senior was in power economy showed the signs of upcoming boom. Clinton took a credit for it and was reelected. During Clinton administration economy was overheating which was bringing lots of tax revenue. Many incentives were introduced when they were not needed which is a cause of current deep recession. You have noticed people civilians killed when Bush attacked Iraq. That is true but there was a clear goal to free Iraqis from tyrant. I have no statistics on Clintons death toll but we all know that he bombed such dangerous thing as pharmaceutical facilities. During his administration 1.5 million Iraqis died due to sanctions - some stats are available after all. Then there was Yugoslavia, Afghanistan bombing etc Maybe Bush's war in Iraq did cause the death of up to 10,000 but Iraqis are not dying by millions anymore. at the end of Clinton administration the 1st signs of upcoming recession appeared and, of course, you blame Bush for that re: I wonder which is more serious? good question

To: jackhach who wrote (493506)	11/16/2003 12:36:41 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

You wrote:<font color=blue>"Clinton lies about a BJ and so he must answer to Hillary ..."<font color=black> Think about how foolish you sound. Clinton was chasing a chubby intern around the oval office, and lying about it, while Osama bin Laden was making plans to murder thousands of Americans. Clinton was too interested in getting BJs and lying about it, rather than taking the Muslim terrorist threat seriously. But you say that he only had to answer to Hillary!? You wrote:<font color=blue>"Bush lies about WMD etc.."<font color=black> Where is ONE item of proof that Bush lied about WMD?! First, we don't know where Saddam's WMD are hidden. Second, the UN, and all of the nations of the UN were very much concerned about Saddam's WMD programs for many years. You are lying because, as most thinking people on SI believe, you have no evidence that Bush lied, and you are deliberately slandering him for your own political goals. Instead of "In God We Trust", the Demos want, "In Lies We Trust"!