Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rat dog micro-cap picks... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (15520)	11/16/2003 5:13:46 PM
From: the navigator	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 48461

While we so fervently debate the validity of a link between Iraq and Al Qaeda, let me point out the obvious points of fact that those who find them inconvenient, pretend to ignore: There is no debate on the links between Al Qaeda and Saudi Arabia, why do we ignore that country in our "war on terror?" There is no debate on the links between Al Qaeda and Afghanistan, why do we (virtually) ignore that country? Why the focus on Iraq when there are so many larger targets, if the goal is Al Qaeda and our "war on terror?" And while I'm at it, let me ask this; if the goal is weapons of mass destruction, why are we ignoring North Korea, an avowed possessor of said weapons? Could it be that Iraq is just the first in a series of conquests?