SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Valuation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Biomaven who wrote (9502)11/17/2003 1:17:42 PM
From: RCMac  Respond to of 52153
 
That AMGN number is incredible - nearly 40% compounded over close on 20 years. Wonder how that compares with Microsoft?

Quick and dirty calculation: 35.9% since March 13, 1986 (from closing price on IPO day, not IPO price).

Yahoo notes that MSFT closed on 3/13/86, the first day of trading, at 32.25, and that it has split very many times. Yahoo gives an "adjusted price" of $0.11/share (accounting for splits and distributions, and rounding).

Today MSFT is at 25.11. My HP 12C tells me that's 35.92% (using 17.66 years) compounded annually.

Of course, that number will swing a bit depending on the precise number that Yahoo rounded to 11 cents.

If anyone cares about a more precise number, the IPO price adjusted for the splits would be more a more precise starting point than Yahoo's rounded 11 cents.



To: Biomaven who wrote (9502)11/17/2003 2:00:27 PM
From: scaram(o)uche  Respond to of 52153
 
>> That AMGN number is incredible <<

And that's with a long, long, long period of hitting dry wells.

Binder took over from Rathmann just as the company's R&D group went into deep freeze. He left Business Development and R&D in the hands of those who had gotten the company that far, and it didn't work. Just a guess, but it lasted about ten years?? Binder was genius at milking the big two, and from an operations side.

Sharer has been **brilliant**.