SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: macavity who wrote (41657)11/18/2003 1:42:57 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 74559
 
<<Obesity>> I pay to carry fat people in airplanes. I am 1.75m tall and weigh, max. 63Kg and usually 60Kg, dropping to 58Kg when working flat out.
I pay for those fat people to fly in an airplane. Obesity should be taxed in a way to have a max. 75Kg person weight.
Every Kg of people's mass above this would be charged as excess weight-as luggage excess is today- up to a maximum of 85Kg. Between 85Kg and 95Kg the charges for excess would be hefty.
First Class and Business class would continue flat rate as today.
That would give an incentive to people to trim their weight to save money, and as a result being more healthy. We must do to the fat people what people do to smokers.
Pushing them out of the mainstream.



To: macavity who wrote (41657)11/19/2003 2:51:31 AM
From: Mark Adams  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 74559
 
An obesity tariff, perhaps?

Were that the case.

Sugar: a fuel at heart. But also a drug like substance with mood altering affects. Very high impact costs when one accounts for diabetes, and other undesirable effects. It seems just about everything we consume includes some potential harm.

That sure does sound ridiculously high.

Check out this post; It's what started the thought process
Message 19507809