Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jackhach who wrote (494670)	11/18/2003 10:24:50 AM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

yes, and your MA. neighbor that wishes to legally marry his Donkey, NelleBelle, will be happy too...seeing as how you MA. folks like to shake off cobwebs...

To: jackhach who wrote (494670)	11/18/2003 10:45:56 AM
From: George Coyne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

You're from Mass., eh? That explains a few things.

To: jackhach who wrote (494670)	11/18/2003 10:49:17 AM
From: jim-thompson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

At least they are not Rump Rangers. LOL

To: jackhach who wrote (494670)	11/18/2003 1:25:51 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Cheney on marriage: We'll remind you about what Cheney said in the October 2000 vice presidential debate with Senator Lieberman. "The — the fact of the matter is we live in a free society, and — and freedom means freedom for everybody. We don't get to choose and shouldn't be able to choose and say, 'You get to live free, but you don't.' And — and I think that means that people should be free to enter into any kind of relationship they want to enter into. It's really no one else's business, in terms of trying to regulate or — or prohibit behavior in that regard." "The next step then, of course, is the question you ask of whether or not there ought to be some kind of official sanction, if you will, of the relationship or if these relationships should be treated the same way a conventional marriage is. That's a tougher problem. That's not a — a slam dunk. I think the fact of the matter, of course, is that matters regulated by the states — I think different states are likely to come to different conclusions, and that's appropriate. I don't think there should necessarily be a federal policy in this area." abcnews.go.com