SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GraceZ who wrote (267748)11/20/2003 4:31:37 AM
From: zonder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
How many arguments did I read right here on these boards about the tax cuts, that the tax cuts should never be directed to those who paid the highest taxes but to those who "need" the money?

With all due respect, Grace, I highly doubt if any of those arguments were voiced by advocates of a communist regime in the US. If I recall correctly, the discussion was as follows: Tax cuts aimed at the rich do not translate into higher consumption as much as tax cuts aimed at the poor. There is simple logic to this - A guy who is worth several millions is probably not holding back his consumption, and will not spend more just because his annual income just went up from $500,000 to $550,000. On the other hand, a salaried man with five kids will probably go ahead and get those shoes he's been postponing for the youngest two.

I do agree that if the aim of the tax cut was to boost the economy through higher consumption, it would be much more logical to aim the tax cuts towards people in the lower income brackets. That's hardly advocating communism.

It's the worst kind of tyranny.

Surely, you jest :-)

You could say that, in the strictest sense, Socialism isn't Communism but it is positioned further along the continuum that runs between Capitalism and Communism.

Or I could say, even in the loosest sense, that Socialism and Communism are two different things.

If the dollar loses it's position as THE reserve currency, it won't be some Socialist currency that takes it's place, it'll be some other place where capital is most likely already flowing even as we have this discussion.

And which country is worthy to the throne, would you say, as the second most fervent practitioner of near-perfect Capitalism?

The choice of reserve currency doesn't arise from the effect of a currency being adjusted to account for a large trade deficit and traders actions. It arises from a history of trust, physical security, military might and the long rule of law protecting the principle of private property.

I am not sure I agree with all that. I would be interested to read about a historical document where the choice of USD as reserve currency has come from other countries' awe of US military might, though.

I don't know what you mean by "traders' actions", for you must have noticed it is the Fed talking down the USD rather than traders speculating on it.

Say what you will about the Fed and their actions, but US Treasury bonds are still considered to have zero default risk against which all other debt obligations are measured.

Come on, Grace. You know it and I know it that ANY country's t-bills denominated in their own currency are zero-risk. How can US default t-bills as long as they have a printing press? :-)

What those t-bills will be worth once printing press warms up is of course another story...

They receive dollars for their goods, they lend us back those same dollars in exchange for a promise of more dollars in the future

That it worked so far is no guarantee that it will work in the future. Abandoning the strong dollar policy was probably a good decision for the Current Account deficit (although the recent rise in imports boggles the mind slightly) but it didn't do much for the continuation of the trust in the USD as the reserve currency.

Anyway, we will wait and see, I guess. EUR/USD hit 1.1942 this morning. All I am saying is that it is not cast in stone that USD will be the world's reserve currency forever and ever. The chances that it will be dethroned one day are higher now than several years ago after the abandon of the strong dollar policy, not to mention a strange policy of spending billions on invading countries than spending more billions on rebuilding them, while nursing twin deficits at home...