SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TGL WHAAAAAAAT! Alerts, thoughts, discussion. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: StockDung who wrote (123006)11/18/2003 6:07:00 PM
From: StocksDATsoar  Respond to of 150070
 
: IPIC International, Inc., et al.: Lit. Rel. No. 18470 / November 18, 2003

sec.gov


Home Previous Page







UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 18470 / November 18, 2003
Securities and Exchange Commission v. IPIC International, Inc., et al. Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-2781-P, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Dallas Division).

SEC HALTS MASSIVE PONZI SCHEME THAT TARGETED EVANGELICAL CHRISTIAN CONGREGATIONS BY FILING EMERGENCY CIVIL ACTION

Federal Criminal Authorities Unseal Indictments, Arrest Multiple Defendants

On November 17, 2003, in coordination with federal criminal authorities and state regulators, the Commission filed an emergency action in United States district court in Dallas to halt an offering of unregistered securities through which the defendants have fraudulently raised at least $160 million from investors associated with evangelical Christian congregations. In its complaint, the Commission alleged that the defendants deceived investors, promising to generate investment returns that would benefit Christian ministries through merchandising and manufacturing businesses; but in fact, according to the Commission, the defendants invested little, if any, of the investors' money in that way, and instead used it to make ponzi payments to other investors and support their own extravagant lifestyles by purchasing items such as homes, a yacht, and a helicopter. Also on November 17, U.S. District Judge Jorge Solis granted the Commission's motion for a temporary restraining order, an asset freeze, and the appointment of a receiver to collect and preserve investors' assets.

In its action, the Commission charged the following defendants:

IPIC International, Inc. (a/k/a International Product Investment Corp.) ("IPIC"), a Nevada corporation with its principal place of business in Ontario, California, that purports to be in the business of manufacturing, buying and selling a variety of commercial goods, including bottled water, toys, paint, furniture, decorative items, and railroad ties;

IPIC Atlantic LLC, a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Orlando, Florida, that markets IPIC to potential investors;

Home Recovery Network, Inc. ("HRN"), a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Montclair, California, which purports to be a "division" of IPIC, and purports to be in the business of buying and selling real estate;

Gregory Setser, age 47, of Alta Loma, California, the founder, president and CEO of IPIC;

Cynthia Setser, age 47, of Alta Loma, California, Gregory Setser's wife and alleged business partner, and IPIC's treasurer;

Charnelle Setser, age 21, of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Gregory Setser's daughter-in-law and IPIC's office manager;

Deborah Setser, age 38, of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Gregory Setser's sister and vice president of Home Recovery Network;

Charmaine Sears, age 44, of Lake Elsinore, California, Charnelle Setser's mother and Gregory Setser's assistant; and

Torsten Thomas Henschke, age 48, of Orlando, Florida, executive international director of IPIC Atlantic.
In its complaint, the Commission alleges that the defendants raised at least $160 million within the past three years by offering and selling "joint venture agreements" to evangelical Christian leaders, members of evangelical congregations, and affiliated organizations. The Commission further alleges that the joint venture agreements typically provided that: investor funds would be used to purchase various goods or real estate; IPIC and HRN were responsible for re-selling the goods or real estate; and profits from re-selling the goods and real estate would be shared with investors. According to the Commission, no registration statement has been filed with the Commission as to any of the joint venture agreements.

The Commission further alleges that, in connection with the offer and sale of these investment programs, the defendants, at various times, represented to investors that: (1) their principal was not at risk; (2) they would receive a 25% return on their investment within three to six months; (3) they would receive monthly returns ranging from 5.35% to 6.75%; and (4) only 1 in 10,000 deals resulted in a loss. In addition, according to the Commission, investors were led to believe that IPIC had bought billions of dollars worth of goods and sold them to large, well-known retailers, such as Mikasa, Inc., Michaels Stores, Inc., Costco Wholesale, Inc., Garden Ridge Corp., J.C. Penney Co., and Pier 1 Imports, Inc.

In fact, however, according to the Commission, the defendants were actually perpetrating a massive ponzi scheme and continuing to solicit money from unsuspecting investors, including evangelical Christian congregations. For example, the Commission alleges that IPIC's bank statements show no evidence of the commercial transactions that the joint venture agreements describe: neither outgoing payments to vendors nor incoming payments from customers appear in the bank records. Instead, according to the Commission's complaint, the bank records reflect apparent ponzi payments to investors, as well as overseas transfers of funds and purchases of luxury items (e.g., a yacht, homes and a helicopter). Furthermore, the Commission alleges that none of the retailers who IPIC identified as customers have any record of purchasing goods from IPIC or Greg Setser.

Finally, according to the Commission, as recently as October 10, 2003, IPIC was offering its investors the opportunity to convert their joint venture agreements into IPIC "founder's shares," which were supposedly going to be publicly traded on Nasdaq within 90-120 days; but, as of October 23, 2003, IPIC had not filed an application for listing with Nasdaq.

The Commission also named in its complaint, as relief defendants (seeking return of investor funds they unjustly received and company records) the following individuals associated with IPIC:

Eva Setser, age 68, of Alta Loma, California, Gregory Setser's mother and IPIC's corporate secretary; and

Larry Kuncl, age 47, of Upland, California, Gregory Setser's brother-in-law and president of Crossties Technology, Inc., a purported manufacturing concern that operates out of IPIC's Ontario, California office.
The Commission alleges in its complaint that the defendants violated Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. In addition to seeking emergency relief as described above, the Commission is also seeking orders of permanent injunction, disgorgement plus prejudgment interest, and civil money penalties. The Commission is also seeking asset freezes and disgorgement against the relief defendants, because they hold title to, or received proceeds from the sale of, assets allegedly acquired with investor funds.

On November 18, 2003, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Texas unsealed a securities fraud and money laundering indictment against Gregory, Cynthia, Charnelle and Deborah Setser, and Henschke, and agents for the FBI and IRS arrested all of those individuals.

The Commission acknowledges the assistance and cooperation of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Texas, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the IRS Criminal Investigation Division, and the Texas State Securities Board.



sec.gov

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 11/18/2003



To: StockDung who wrote (123006)11/18/2003 6:09:51 PM
From: StocksDATsoar  Respond to of 150070
 
sec.gov


Home | Previous Page







U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No.18448 / November 6, 2003
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Peter C. Lybrand f/k/a Peter C. Tosto, Richard S. Kern, Donald R. Kern, Charles Wilkins, Admiral Investments Ltd., Compulink International Corp., Drawbridge Investments Ltd., Glittergrove Investments Ltd., Grafton Investments Ltd., Greenford Investments Ltd., McDonalds Ltd., Oasis Enterprises Ltd., Investor Relations, Inc., Tellerstock, Inc., Conversant Enterprises, Inc., EFI Corp. a/k/a Electronic Funds, Inc., Barclay Bankcard, Inc., Canyon Vista Corp., and Salteaux Ltd. a/k/a First American Security Corp. a/k/a First American Securities Corp., Defendants, and Hannah G Irrevocable Trust and Hannah R Trust, Relief Defendants, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 00 Civ. 1387 (SHS)
COURT FINDS THAT RICHARD S. KERN, DONALD R. KERN AND CHARLES WILKINS ENGAGED IN FRAUD AND DECEIT IN MARKET MANIPULATION
Richard S. Kern, Donald R. Kern and Charles Wilkins
Are Permanently Enjoined and Ordered to Pay
$7.7 Million in Disgorgement and Interest and $1.1 Million in Civil Penalties
On September 11, 2003, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York found that Richard S. Kern, of Weston, Florida, Donald R. Kern, of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and Charles Wilkins, of Scottsdale, Arizona, had engaged in fraud and deceit by participating in a "market manipulation that resulted in millions of dollars in losses to unwitting investors, and could not have occurred but for defendants' active involvement and knowledge." In a Final Judgment entered on October 2, 2003, the Court enjoined Richard Kern, Donald Kern, and Charles Wilkins, and three entities, EFI Corp., Barclay Bankcard, Inc., and Canyon Vista Corp., from violating Section 5(a) and (c) of the Securities Act of 1933. Defendants Richard Kern, Donald Kern, and Charles Wilkins previously had consented, without admitting or denying the Commission's allegations, to an injunction prohibiting them from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

The Court ordered Richard Kern, Donald Kern, and Charles Wilkins to pay disgorgement of almost $6 million, plus prejudgment interest of about $1.7 million, jointly and severally with EFI Corp., Barclay Bankcard, Inc., and Canyon Vista Corp. The Court ordered relief defendants Hannah R Trust and Hannah G Irrevocable Trust to pay disgorgement of almost $1 million, plus prejudgment interest of approximately $280,000. The Court also ordered Richard and Donald Kern to pay a civil penalty of $400,000 each, and ordered Charles Wilkins to pay a $300,000 civil penalty. When determining whether to impose the penalties, the Court considered, among other things, "the individuals' lack of cooperation with the SEC with respect to the diminution of assets - the proceeds of illegal activities - that were frozen pursuant to an Order of this Court on July 6, 2000."

The Commission's complaint, filed on February 24, 2000, alleged that the Kerns and Wilkins aided and abetted co-defendant Peter C. Lybrand in a stock manipulation and that the Kerns and Wilkins made unregistered sales of the securities of three shell corporations: Polus, Inc., Citron, Inc., and Electronic Transfer Associates, Inc. ("ETA"). Lybrand, formerly known as Peter C. Tosto, was enjoined by the Court in this case in March 2002, and is serving an 87-month prison sentence for crimes he committed in connection with the manipulation, among other things. The complaint alleged that beginning in March 1998, Lybrand arranged to acquire Polus, Citron, and ETA from the Kerns and Wilkins, who controlled virtually all of the issued and outstanding shares of the shell corporations. Instead of collecting their sale price directly from Lybrand, the complaint alleged that the Kerns and Wilkins agreed to accumulate their sale price by selling a small percentage of their shares into the public market. Since there was not an active trading market for the securities, Lybrand created an artificial market by orchestrating a series of matched trades in which the Kerns and Wilkins sold their shares to other parties at prices fixed by Lybrand. The complaint further alleged that Lybrand also created interest in the stocks by issuing misleading press releases. Lybrand's manipulation of the securities market caused the stock prices of each corporation to increase dramatically. Finally, the complaint alleged that after the Kerns and Wilkins had accumulated their sale price, they transferred to Lybrand the balance of the shares that they owed him and then continued to sell their remaining shares into the market at artificially inflated prices, realizing total illegal profits of about $6 million before the Commission suspended trading in the securities on January 29, 1999.

The Commission acknowledges the assistance of NASD Regulation, Inc., in this matter. For further background information, please see Litigation Release No. 16448 (February 24, 2000) and Litigation Release No. 16064 (February 18, 1999).

sec.gov

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 11/06/2003