SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dr. Voodoo who wrote (494990)11/18/2003 4:21:06 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Respond to of 769667
 
Voodoo,
I don't think you understand, I have just watched the US software industry go offshore, I am in management with a VC firm engaging in the activity.

I don't think we should be protecting your industry of drugs. Your industry does not employ many people compared to the software and film industries. Your business is a high cost, low return business, thems the facts.

If we are going to protect an industry it should be film/media in the US, that is our strongest export and next might be software or design. Drugs are way near the bottom in terms of cost benefit analysis. Way down there.



To: Dr. Voodoo who wrote (494990)11/18/2003 7:30:27 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Dr. Voodoo,

Re: I'm done educating you Lizzie. I'm sorry if you don't get it.

A lot of us "don't get it" because we see big Pharma ripping us off. There are many substantiated cases were the basic science of a new drug is done at public expense through NIH and the IP is transferred to big Pharma which has little development cost involved, yet charges the public exorbitant prices, while the money that you so hypocritically suggest is going to R&D is actually being expended on grossly wasteful advertising and marketing campaigns.

Yeah, there's a lot we "don't get" about big Pharma, especially about why they should be allow to get away with ripping us off.