SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jmhollen who wrote (495024)11/18/2003 4:52:08 PM
From: laura_bush  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
William Novelli has Unilever in his background.

And little else. He's a PR hack.

But that Unilever connection might mean corrupt interest in the passage of this big pharma "write your own check" bill of the Republican cabal.

lb



To: jmhollen who wrote (495024)11/18/2003 5:00:37 PM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
It is fun watching the Democrats twist in the wind...did not take long for the natterers to come out of the woodwork, did it?



To: jmhollen who wrote (495024)11/18/2003 5:11:08 PM
From: jackhach  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
>>Lee Iacocca<<

The man who borrowed billions from the USA under Carter -- was given huge pay concessions from UAW and then built millions of horrible running K-Cars (suckered in many Americans to buy em'.) He then turns around cuts a check to the USA (free loan) and then cuts himself a psycho-huge check and fires most of the UAW who were promised pay raise upon finalization of the agreement with the US Treasury. Most of the money for repaying the loan came from junk bonds issued from the collateral of the Chrysler employee pension plan. The bonds later soured and they had to renegotiate the debt so as to avoid scrutiny of what Reagan ignored.

Need not worry: Lee smartly waited till Reagan was president and Reagan quietly ignored the details about the workers contract under the agreement.

Are you talking about that LEE?

-JH