SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (31734)11/19/2003 12:16:57 PM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 89467
 
NEWS: China, U.S. Tit-For-Tat Trade Spat Grows
Wednesday November 19, 10:07 am ET
By Scott Hillis

biz.yahoo.com

BEIJING (Reuters) - China denounced a move by the United States to cap selected textile imports on Wednesday and scrapped missions to buy American farm goods, saying the U.S. measure sullied the spirit of free trade.

China postponed indefinitely a plan to send a delegation to buy U.S. cotton and wheat, an industry source in Hong Kong told Reuters, news that followed cancellation of a separate trip to buy soybeans.

The cancellations were blamed on visa and logistical problems but raised fears they were retaliation for the U.S. quotas on imports some Chinese textiles.

The Bush administration said on Tuesday it would slap import quotas on Chinese knit fabrics, bras and robes, signaling a new line of attack against the world's fifth-largest trading nation. Some U.S. officials have blamed job losses on the rapid rise of Chinese textile imports.

"The Chinese government expresses deep regret and firmly opposes this decision," Commerce Ministry spokesman Chong Quan said in a statement.

It "runs against WTO principles on free trade, transparency and non-discrimination," Chong said, adding that China may take the dispute to the World Trade Organization.

The U.S. measure concerns less than five percent of China's textile exports to the United States and won't take effect for three months.

U.S. National Security Council spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters in London the administration was committed to free trade and that the textile move was "consistent with our commitment to ensure that U.S. companies have time to adjust to market disruptions caused by rising imports."

TEMPORARY SPEEDBUMPS

Deputy U.S. Trade Representative Josette Shiner said the safeguards were included as part of China's WTO entry package as a way to temporarily slow the pace of fast-growing imports.

"They were designed as some temporary speedbumps if we saw a surge in certain import areas," she told reporters in Beijing.

Chinese officials had made clear they would have preferred Washington not invoke the safeguards but had not indicated what their response would be, Shiner said.

The quotas would cap the rise in Chinese textile shipments at 7.5 percent above the total for the last year or so, and would be in place for a year.

The move stoked fears Washington may be shifting to more protectionist policies, helping push the dollar to record lows against the euro overnight.

U.S. manufacturers say China has pumped up its trade surplus with the United States by keeping the exchange rate of its yuan currency unfairly low, giving its goods an edge in world markets.

The United States estimates its deficit with China will rise about 20 percent this year to $120 billion, a hot political issue in the run-up to the 2004 presidential elections.

"We expect the Bush administration to take further steps to restrict imports of Chinese textile products, which is likely to lead to flare-ups in trade conflicts between China and the United States," said Guo Changsheng, textile analyst at China Southern Securities.

CHINESE CALL FOR ACTION

China had been scheduled to send several groups to the United States over the next few weeks as part of a multi-billion dollar shopping spree aimed at showing it was serious about narrowing the trade gap.

A Commerce Ministry spokesman said one purchasing delegation had been delayed due to "itinerary problems" but declined to say what the group had intended to buy.

Some Chinese business groups called for retaliation.

"I think we should react somehow and call on the government to do something," said Shi Jianwei, executive vice president of the China Cotton Association and head of the China Cotton and Jute Bureau.

Reached again later, Shi said he had not heard the cotton trip had been canceled, but added he felt the delegation should still go for talks even if they didn't buy any cotton.

China's Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Textiles said in a statement the move would "ruin the fundamental interest of Chinese textile exporters" and hurt American consumers.

The chamber also said China's imports of U.S. fabric and raw material had skyrocketed this year, jumping nearly 150 percent year on year to hit nearly $790 million in the first nine months.

The American textile industry, which said it has lost more than 316,000 jobs since the start of 2001, praised the U.S. decision but said it should merely be a first step to putting a lid on virtually all Chinese textile imports.

($1 = 8.276 yuan)

(Additional reporting by Tamora Vidaillet, Judy Hua and Zhou Xiqin in Beijing, Nao Nakanishi in Hong Kong, Richard Cowan in Washington and K.T. Arasu in Chicago)



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (31734)11/20/2003 12:04:44 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
CAMPAIGN FOR AMERICA'S FUTURE: The Bush Administration’s Snow Job on the Economy

ourfuture.org
1025 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, NW SUITE 205 * WASHINGTON, DC 20036 * TEL (202) 955-5665 FAX (202) 955-5606

www.ourfuture.org

The Bush Administration’s Snow Job on the Economy

Despite the Cheerleading, the Bush Tax Breaks for Mllionaires are a Proven Failure

The Bush economic cheerleading squad is in motion – claiming that their tax breaks created jobs last month and the remarkable 7.2% economic growth reported last quarter. To sell their budget-busting tax breaks for millionaires, George Bush promised 5.5 million new jobs. Then last month, Treasury Secretary John Snow “boldly” promised that they would generate 2 million new jobs before the next election (less than the Bush administration said the economy would create with no tax breaks at all). An archetypal snow job. But look behind the pom poms to find the real results of Bush economic policies: pink slips and broken promises.

A reality check, by the numbers:

(October) Average monthly new jobs projected by Bush admin………………………… 200,000 (1)

(February) Average monthly new jobs economy would generate without tax cuts as estimated by Bush admin…………… 228,333 (2)

(February) Average monthly new jobs promised from tax breaks……………………… 306,000 (3)

Number of new jobs Bush promised, June through October……..………………………. 1,224,000 (4)

Number of new jobs Bush actually produced, June through October….……………… 229,000 (5)

Shortfall below projection……………………………………………………………………………… 995,000

Number of jobs lost to date since Bush took office………………………………………….. 2.43 million jobs lost (6)

(October) Bush admin. projection of new jobs created by end of 2004………………. 2.0 million (7)

(October) Bush admin. projection of net new jobs created by end of 2004………… 430,000 jobs lost

Last president to lose jobs during entire first term…………………………………………… Herbert Hoover (1929-1933) (8)

Job creation, Bill Clinton, 8 years…………………………………………………………………… 22.4 million new jobs (9)

Bush admin. own estimate of jobs creation after 4 years…………………………………. 430,000 jobs lost (10)

US Manufacturing jobs lost 1979 – 2000, 21 years……………………………..…………… 2.4 million (11)

US Manufacturing jobs lost since Bush took office, 2 years, 10 months……………… 2.56 million (12)

Budget surplus 2001, when Bush took office…………………………………………………… + $127 Billion (13)

Bush estimate of Budget deficit FY 2003…………………………………………………………. - $401 billion (14)

Average annual tax cut Bush promised to Americans……………………………………….. $1000 (15)

Average tax cut actually received by 65 million Americans…………………………………$19 (16)

Average tax cut actually received by top 1%…………………………………………………… $28,414 (17)

Dollars short of Bush promise in his Leave No Child Behind act…………………………. $9.4 billion short (18)

Amount federal spending on public schools, two years………………………………………$59 billion (19)

Amount federal spending for Iraq, Afghanistan two years………………………………….$166 billion (20)

Decrease, medium household income, last two years………………………………………..$1,439 (21)

Annual minimum wage earnings for full time worker………………………………………… $10,712 (22)

Vice President Dick Cheney annual salary from government……………………………… $192,600 (23)

2001 Halliburton payments to Vice President Cheney (yearly)…………………………… $205,298 (24)

Value of no bid contracts awarded to Halliburton in Iraq………………………………….. $948 million (25)

FOOTNOTES:

1 New York Times, Edmund Andrews. “Treasury Chief Sees a Job Boom, But Most Don’t.” (October, 21 2003)
2 Council of Economic Advisors projection (2/2003)—explained at,
jobwatch.org
3 Council of Economic Advisors projection (2/2003)—explained at,
jobwatch.org
4 Job Watch, www.jobwatch.org. Derived from Council on Economic Advisors projections
5 Job Watch, www.jobwatch.org.
6 Bureau of Labor Statistics, numbers in thousands: Change in employment level: 136181(Jan. ’01) – 138619(Oct. ’03) = -
2.438 million jobs lost. www.bls.gov
7 New York Times: Edmund Andrews. “Treasury Chief Sees a Job Boom, But Most Don’t.” (October, 21 2003)
8 New York Times, David Leonhardt. “Bush Record on Jobs: Risking Unhappy Comparisons.” July 3, 2003, citing
information compiled from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
9 Bureau of Labor Statistics, bls.gov
10 Determined by adding Treasury Secretary Snow’s projected job growth (2 million) to the 2.7 million jobs already lost
during the administration.
11 Bureau of Labor Statistics, 19.5 million manufacturing jobs in 1979 – 17.1 million 2000= 2.4 million. bls.gov
12 Bureau of Labor Statistics: 17.101 million (manufacturing jobs in January 2001) -14.54 (manufacturing jobs in October
2003) = 2.56 million lost since Bush took office. bls.gov
13 Congressional Budget Office, cbo.gov
14 Congressional Budget Office, cbo.gov
15 State of the Union address 2003, whitehouse.gov
16 Citizens for Tax Justice ctj.org
17 Citizens for Tax Justice-- ctj.org
18 NEA-- nea.org
19 Budget of the US Government w3.access.gpo.gov
20 Washington Post—Chris Van Hollen, “Paying the Postwar Tab With Plastic.” (October 27, 2003). 87 billion requested
plus 79 billion already spend = 166 billion dollars.
21 U.S. Census Bureau-Median household income has dropped 3.3% over the past two years. This decline represents a loss
of $1,439 over the past two years. census.gov, also available at
epinet.org
22 EPI-- epinet.org
23 Office of Personnel Management, www.opm.gov
24 Office of Government Ethics, Cheney’s financial disclosure filings
25 New York Daily News, Kenneth R. Bazinet. “Halliburton Contracts in Iraq my Trigger Congressional Probe.”
(September 19, 2003.)