SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: AK2004 who wrote (495683)11/19/2003 7:11:09 PM
From: sea_biscuit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
anything that would stop cruise missiles?

No, something that can kill many of the 37K American soldiers at the border. And it doesn't matter how many NK soldiers/people are killed, not when they are fighting for their land.

Keep in mind that in Vietnam, the number of dead on the other side was 2 million -- TWENTY times more than what we lost. But it doesn't matter if it is twenty or forty or hundred if you have the motivation and/or have no other choice. And if your land is attacked, you do have the motivation and you really have no other choice.



To: AK2004 who wrote (495683)11/19/2003 9:06:14 PM
From: Rick McDougall  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
<anything that would stop cruise missiles?>.....Geezzz ak, you are out of control:o)



To: AK2004 who wrote (495683)11/19/2003 9:35:53 PM
From: Joel Karlinsky  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
You sir, are the one who is ignorant. One doesn't win wars with cruise missles. We didn't win in Iraq with cruise missles, we had to send foot soldiers in. You know, capture territory the old fashioned way. Duh! And it was the threat of conflict that got Saddam to comply. The actual conflict was unnecessary. NO WMD = compliance! OIL and $$$$$. Bush is a liar and a crook, a rich boy who never did an honest day's work in his life. If he did, please tell me where and when. He was weaned on Poppy's money and influence.