To: ralfph who wrote (5243 ) 11/20/2003 12:12:05 PM From: marcos Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8273 Around eight years ago i had a bunch of bank stock with a full-service broker, they used to split it up on the statements, put some under a category they called 'segregated', these were the ones they'd loaned out to shorters .... it would tend to be odd numbers, for instance if you had 2k of something, they would show 1173 shares segregated, and the rest not [integrated, presumably?] .... this wasn't supposed to have any effect on me, and it didn't, until one time they got their long division or addition wrong, and they started adding the odd number to original whole number of shares, to get the total held .... like in the above case, they would show 2k free of encumbrance, plus 1173 segregated, for a total of 3173 ..... this was great, i definitely liked their attitude, only problem was i didn't notice it until after they sent me a note saying they were adjusting it back to the correct figure .... they'd made the mistake on four or five monthly statements, but i hadn't read them, just always kept a running balance in my head ..... for a long time afterwards, i read their statements carefully, checked arithmetic etc Greenline lost several trades for me about three years ago now, when they were extremely busy there, just before the tech bubble popped .... they didn't lose them completely though, the trades didn't show up on statements or the online account but they still sent me confirmations, go figure how that would happen ..... it's a good idea to keep a pencil and paper record of each trade, with the order number and time of day, also its fill time if you see it go through tm.v - good show, nice intersection .... pisses me off a little though, i wanted to add shares but was being cheap about it xcl.to - bit of strength today in the X-machine, meeting is on monday and i expect a new 52-week high by then, wondering if we see a new 7-year high as well, it only has to print 1.01 for that