Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (16859)	11/20/2003 12:00:01 AM
From: MSI	Respond to of 793691

That's Dean's approach. They should have gone for civil unions arkansas.fordean.org ""The only people who call civil unions 'gay marriage' are poorly informed reporters and the right wing of the Republican Party. Civil unions mean gay people get to have the same rights I do. Such as if I get sick, my wife can visit me in the hospital; if I die, my wife gets the estate without probate." “I think the Defenses of Marriage Act is unconstitutional, because I don't think that the federal government has any business talking about partnership and marriage laws to the states. The federal government should recognize civil unions. The federal government shouldn't force all states to have civil unions, but all states have to figure out how to guarantee equal rights.”