Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (496216)	11/20/2003 5:14:00 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

so...you do not mind nambla too much then and believe they should be left to operate freely?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (496216)	11/20/2003 5:20:50 PM
From: SeachRE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Watch out yourself, buddyboy. Cops are not giving you people a break these days...

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (496216)	11/20/2003 5:36:57 PM
From: Tech Master	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Legitimizing deviant behavior should not be a function of government. They can do what they want but don't ask the government to sanction their perversion.

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (496216)	11/20/2003 5:46:30 PM
From: Bald Eagle	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Everyone is treated equally, any man can marry a woman and any woman can marry a man. Very nice and simple. I don't believe in prosecuting consenting sexual behavior between adults in privacy, but I don't believe two people of the same sex should be able to enter into a marriage that is the equivalent of two people of the opposite sex being married. The main driver behind marriage was to give a secure environment for children and thus strengthen the community. Since 2 gays can never have kids, why should they be allowed to marry?