SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (17352)11/23/2003 11:18:29 AM
From: MSI  Respond to of 793843
 
Very thoughtful essay

The right wing has now devised a pseudo-politics, of which the "conservative revolution" is a primary feature. It may look like the real thing, sound like the real thing and, most important, be covered by the media as if it were the real thing, but it is essentially just a way to gain media attention, which is usually enough to convince people that it is the real thing. If the objective of cultural politics is to win adherents, the objective of this postmodernist pseudo-politics is to convey the idea that you have already won adherents — that the revolution has already occurred and power has been transferred.

He's got a point.

The larger point is that this isn't really a conservative/liberal movement going on, it's incremental movement towards command-and-control vs freedom.

Though this process is little remarked upon, it has profound implications for the culture, suggesting a psychological shift at least as important as the supposed one after 9/11: that watching entertainment now seems less gratifying than knowing about it.

For example, notice the author carefully avoids simply saying "watching entertainment is less gratifying...". The implications are much more serious than buzz-about-buzz, it's that actual information required for democracy is missing. The real question is "what do we do about that?". It also condemns those creating buzz-about-buzz, which in this article points to the GOP as the nuevo-masters.

This kind of media control destroys democracy. What's needed in the money-media-elections-corporate legislation circle-jerk is free media access to political contenders, which would cost $1 billion/yr in avoided revenues to the hungry media conglomerates. That can only be implemented by serious anger by the populace. So far, they're content with hypnotic buzzzzzz.... zzzzzzzzz.

For the media and our political oligarchy, that's "Mission Accomplished".